Sunday, January 2, 2022

Brave New World

 In the final chapters of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, at the climax of the story, the Savage finally meets the Controller and has a philosophical and theological discussion that brings out the implications of engineering and conditioning humans to create a perfect society. While the brave new world is free of pain, suffering, violence, and need, those who inhabit it have been dehumanized and turned into slaves for the elite. Much of the debate between the two characters echoes much of what we are currently facing in our world today. Do we want a world free of suffering and pain, maintained by totalitarian control and various forms of drugs and entertainment, or do we want freedom and full expression of humanity along with all the messiness that it entails? 

In the brave new world old books and ideas are forbidden because they disrupt the well-ordered society that has been engineered by the elites. Tragedies require social instability. Without social instability there are no tragedies, so most old literature would not be understandable to those who have been engineered and conditioned to obey the new world order and who live in a society where everything that can create discomfort has been eliminated. 

While beauty is attractive, the elite don’t want people to be attracted by old things; they want them to like the new ones, even though the new things are stupid and horrible. The Controller states: “You can't make tragedies without social instability. The world's stable now. People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can't get. They're well off; they're safe; they're never ill; they're not afraid of death; they're blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they're plagued with no mothers or fathers; they've got no wives, or children, or lovers to feel strongly about; they're so conditioned that they practically can't help behaving as they ought to behave. And if anything should go wrong, there's soma. Which you go and chuck out of the window in the name of liberty, Mr. Savage.”

However, by eliminating all that causes pain and displeasure, the brave new world has eliminated all that makes us human. In the new world order there is no Truth, no Beauty, no Love, no Passion, no Freedom, no Choice, no Hope. By engineering out all negative thoughts and feelings, the elites have created a world that is inhuman. They have been genetically engineered and psychologically conditioned, that "they practically can't help behaving as they ought to behave.”

By eradicating all misery and conflict, mankind has been relegated to a bland existence. The Controller states: “Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand.”

It requires a delicate balance to engineer and condition each level of society in order to achieve maximum productivity while maintaining social stability. For example, only so many humans are allowed to be Alpha pluses, otherwise there would be civil war or the elites would get their throats cut.

Instead of executing dissenters, they are sent to remote islands to pursue their own desires and exercise their will. Since they are secluded from civilization, they have no impact on society. Even science has to be controlled, so that only authorized studies and findings are allowed, otherwise war would eventually break out. 

Religion also had to be totally eradicated from society since it depends on pain, misfortune, and lack to thrive, so it also creates instability. In the brave new world there is no lack or loss to be compensated, so there is no need of religion. And when there is some displeasure, there is soma, the drug that keeps all the citizens happy. Since the elites think that people were conditioned to believe in God, they can now be conditioned to not believe in God. In the brave new world, the happy, hard-working, goods-consuming citizen in perfect and has no need of God. 

Since industrial civilization is possible only when there is no self-denial, self-indulgence is encouraged or demanded in order to keep the wheels of prosperity turning. And since there are no wars or misery, there is no need for anyone to be noble or heroic. In fact, in the brave new world, soma, the happy drug, is Christianity without tears or sacrifice. Instead of virtue obtain through self-denial, the civilized man indulges in vice and eradicates all pain and discomfort through conditioning and drugs.

To demand Truth, Beauty, Love, Freedom is to demand danger, pain, suffering, and unhappiness. The climax ends with the exchange between the Savage and the ControllerController:

"But I like the inconveniences."

"We don't," said the Controller. "We prefer to do things comfortably."

"But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin."

"In fact," said Mustapha Mond, "you're claiming the right to be unhappy."

"All right then," said the Savage defiantly, "I'm claiming the right to be unhappy."

"Not to mention the right to grow old and ugly and impotent; the right to have syphilis and cancer; the right to have too little to eat; the right to be lousy; the right to live in constant apprehension of what may happen to-morrow; the right to catch typhoid; the right to be tortured by unspeakable pains of every kind." There was a long silence.

"I claim them all," said the Savage at last.

Mustapha Mond shrugged his shoulders. "You're welcome," he said.


While modern society is dehumanizing in many ways already, and it has been pushing God and Truth out in order to free men to pursue their passions unfettered, the events of the last two years show that the endgame has always been a worldwide totalitarian society where all aspects of life are carefully regulated by the elite. Much of what is happening today was warned about in Brave New World and other books, such as 1984 and Fahrenheit 451. We have to decide whether we want to be "happy" or fully human.

Without pain and suffering, we become shallow, selfish, self-centered, egotistical jerks. Without opposition, self-denial, and struggle, we become weak and slaves to vice. Only those who have suffered can truly love and care for others. Only those who have struggled can truly be virtuous. God created and redeemed us to become fully human, overcoming sin and self through Christ and the indwelling Spirit. Every time Man has tried to create a Utopia, he has ended up creating a Dystopia. Man is incapable of creating a perfect society because those trying to create the perfect society are fallen and sinful. Even the most righteous humans can only create a sinful, broken society. Only Christ can create the true Utopia, and it will be populated with those who have been transformed by him and empowered to live righteously and lovingly. Apart from Christ, there is no Utopia. Any promise made by Man to create a perfect society is a lie and will ultimately lead to a dystopian nightmare. We are on the verge of that happening globally, and every human being will be forced to make a choice between Christ's way or Man's way. History tells us that Man's way is doomed to fail. Choose wisely.


Sunday, December 26, 2021

The Heart of the Matter

In his 1948 novel, the Heart of the Matter, Graham Greene masterfully portrays the emotional and spiritual dilemmas of an aging man in a loveless marriage struggling through a moral crisis brought on by his failure to get promoted and his inability to make his wife happy. Greene dissects the heart and mind of Henry Scobie as he slowly falls apart as he makes one bad decision after another until he chooses to take communion while unrepentant in a state of a mortal sin. He is convinced that he is eternally damned, so he devises a way to commit suicide without anyone discovering the truth. In the end, his wife figures out that he had an affair and schemed to take is own life. Scobie ends a complete failure and doubly damned. 


While I am not a Catholic, it was insightful to get into the mind of a nominal believer and experience his struggles of faith and conscience. Hopefully I can learn from his mistakes and find forgiveness and redemption in Christ for my moral failures and not take the path of Henry Scobie. 


The novel is set on the west coast of Africa during the second world war. Since Greene spent time in the region as a British intelligence officer in Sierra Leone, the novel feels real and much of the descriptions of the climate and culture are captivating. Greene also has keen insight into human psychology and relationships which is very instructive. 


The oppressive heat and rain depicted frequently in the novel symbolizes the moral and emotional condition of the main character. Almost all of the action of the novel takes place in a tiny white community in an African colony, with only a few non-white characters struggling under the dominion of the colonial British. This symbolizes the alienation Scobie feels, and while he belongs to the ruling class, he is subject to forces larger than himself which increasingly alienate him from God, his wife, and his lover. 


The novel has been declared to be one of the best English-language novels of the twentieth century. 

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Ask, Seek, Knock

1.  How can I experience full joy today?
Gracious Father, show me how to experience your full joy today.

2. How can I show love to someone today?
Loving Father, show me how to love everyone you bring into my life today.

3. How can I improve my life in some small way today?
Patient Father, help me grow and develop in some small way today.

4. How can I make someone smile today?
Joyful Father, as you smile down on me today help me smile at others and bring a smile to their face today.

5. How can I increase my excitement today?
Eternal Father, fill me with anticipation for you to fulfill your great plans for me.

6. What do I really want today?
Generous Father, every perfect gift comes from you, so please grant me the desires of my heart today.

7. What can I do today that will dramatically improve my life and the lives of others?
Wise Father, help me prioritize my schedule so I can profoundly impact the lives of others today.

8. How can I draw closer to God today?
Beautiful Father, draw me closer to you so I can bask in your beauty today.

9. What would make me happy today that would also make someone else happy?
Joyful Father, fill me with your joy so I can make others cheerful today.

10. What can I thank someone else for today?
Gracious Father, you have brought so many caring people into my life so help me express my sincerest gratitude to them today.

11. To whom do I need to apologize?
Gracious Father, give me your grace so I can humbly apologize to those whom I have wronged.

12. How can being a child of God make my life and the lives of others better today?
Holy Father, enable me to live fully as your child, imitating you and expressing your heart and character to everyone around me today.

13. How can I experience God’s love in a more profound way and share it with someone else today?
Loving Father, pour out your love into my heart by your Spirit so I can love others today as you have loved me.

14. What can I thank God for today?
Generous Father, you have filled my life with abundance so enable me to express my deepest gratitude to you today.

15. How can I be even more positive and optimistic today than I was yesterday?
Excellent Father, fill my mind today with thoughts that are true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy.

16. What can I do today for someone that would make his or her life better?
Gracious Father, show me how I can bless others today as you have abundantly blessed me.

17. How can I show appreciation for someone I love today?
Merciful Father, help me to show appreciation to everyone today.

18. What good can I do today?
Good Father, fill me with your goodness so I can do good to others today.

19. How can I be the answer to someone’s prayer today?
Faithful Father, use me to answer someone’s prayer today.

20. How can I relax more fully and experience profound peace of mind all day today?
Peaceful Father, help me rest in your presence amidst all my stress, busyness, and problems today.

21. How can I let God use me today?
Sovereign Father, use me today to build your kingdom as you see fit.

22. What miracle do I need God to do for me today?
Almighty Father, demonstrate your power in my life today to meet my needs.

23. What miracle can I allow God to do through me today?
Almighty Father, demonstrate your power through me today as you see fit.

24. How can I experience the power of the resurrection in my life today?
Life-giving Father, since you have raised Christ from the dead and you have raised me with him, express your life-giving power in me and through me today.

25. What is my life’s purpose and what is one thing I can do today to fulfill it in some small or large way?
Wise Father, align my life’s purpose with your purpose and embolden and empower me to live in accordance with your mission today.

26. How can I express the Fruit of Spirit today?
Abundant Father, fill me with your Spirit today so he can produce his fruit in me.

27. How can I abide in Christ more deeply today?
Loving Father, teach me how to abide in Christ more deeply today.

28. What sin do I need to confess and repent of, and what virtue can I develop to replace it?
Righteous and Faithful Father, forgive my sins and cleanse me from all unrighteousness today as I confess my sins and learn to walk in the light.

29. How can I become more like Christ today?  
Holy and Living Father, conform me to the image of your Son today.

30. Who do I need to forgive?
Forgiving Father, help me forgive others as you have forgiven me.

31. What are the most important things to do today?
Wise Father, give me your wisdom today.


Thursday, December 19, 2013

Bibliography



Anderson, Paul N. “Antichristic Errors: Flawed Interpretations Regarding the Johannine Antichrist.” In Text and Community Vol 1, 196–216. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2007.

Aune, David Edward. Revelation. 52. Dallas: Word Books, 1997.

Bauckham, Richard. The Climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1993.

———. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. New Testament Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Beale, G. K. The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans ; Paternoster Press, 1999.

———. “The Danielic Background for Revelation 13-18 and 17:9.” Tyndale Bulletin 31 (January 1, 1980): 163–170.

Beale, G. K., and D. A. Carson, eds. Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.

Beasley-Murray, George Raymond. A Commentary on Mark Thirteen. New York: Macmillan, 1957.

———. Revelation. Edited by D. A. Carson, R. T. France, J. A. Motyer, and G. J. Wenham. New Bible Commentary. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994.

Best, Ernest. The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians. Black’s New Testament Commentaries 13. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1993.

Bousset, Wilhelm. The Antichrist Legend: A Chapter in Christian and Jewish Folklore. Texts and Translations Series no. 24. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1999.

Brown, Raymond Edward. The Epistles of John. 1st ed. Anchor Bible Commentary v. 30. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1982.

Bruce, F. F. 1 & 2 Thessalonians. Word Biblical Commentary 45. Waco, TX: Word Books, 1982.

Caird, G. B. The Revelation of St. John. Black’s New Testament Commentary 19. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1993.

Charles, R. H. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John: With Introduction, Notes, and Indices, Also the Greek Text and English Translation. 44. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1920.

Chilton, David. The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation. Ft. Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987.

Christensen, Duane L. Deuteronomy 1:1-21:9, Revised. 2nd ed. Word Biblical Commentary v. 6A. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2001.

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Crisis and Catharsis: The Power of the Apocalypse. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1984.

———. The Apocalypse. New Testament Message v. 22. Wilmington, DE: M. Glazier, 1979.

———. The Combat Myth in the Book of Revelation. Missoula, MT: Published by Scholars Press for Harvard theological review, 1976.

Collins, John J. Daniel, First Maccabees, Second Maccabees: With an Excursus on the Apocalyptic Genre. Old Testament Message v. 15. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1981.

———. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

———. The Apocalyptic Vision of the Book of Daniel. Harvard Semitic Monographs no. 16. Missoula, MT: Published by Scholars Press for Harvard Semitic Museum, 1977.

Collins, John J., Frank Moore Cross, and Adela Yarbro Collins. Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.

Daly, Robert J., ed. Apocalyptic Thought in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2009.

Dan, Joseph. “Armilus: The Jewish Antichrist and the Origins and Dating of the Sefer Zerubbavel.” In Toward the Millennium, 73–104. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998.

Davies, Philip R. Daniel. Old Testament Guides. Sheffield: JSOT, 1985.

Dawson, W. Bell. “The Meaning of ‘Antichrist’ in the Greek of the New Testament.” Evangelical Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1944): 71–73.

DeSilva, David Arthur. “The ‘Image of the Beast’ and the Christians in Asia Minor: Escalation of Sectarian Tension in Revelation 13.” Trinity Journal 12, no. 2 (September 1, 1991): 185–208.

Dietrich, Manfried, Oswald Loretz, and Joaquín Sanmartín, eds. The Cuneiform Alphabetic Texts: From Ugarit, Ras Ibn Hani and Other Places (ktu). 2nd Engl. Ed. Abhandlungen Zur Literatur Alt-Syrien-Palästinas Und Mesopotamiens Bd. 8. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 1995.

Driver, S. R. The Book of Daniel: With Introduction and Notes. 23. Cambridge: University Press, 1936.

Friedlander, Moriz. “L’ Anti-Messie.” Revue Des Études Juives (1899).

Friesen, Steven J. “Myth and Symbolic Resistance in Revelation 13.” Journal of Biblical Literature 123, no. 2 (June 1, 2004): 281–313.

Furfey, Paul Hanly. “The Mystery of Lawlessness.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 8, no. 2 (1946): 179–191.

Greek Commentaries on Revelation. Ancient Christian Texts. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011.

Gumerlock, Francis X. “Nero Antichrist: Patristic Evidence for the Use of Nero’s Naming in Calculating the Number of the Beast (rev 13:18).” Westminster Theological Journal 68, no. 2 (September 1, 2006): 347–360.

Gunkel, Hermann. Creation and Chaos in the Primeval Era and the Eschaton: A Religio-Historical Study of Genesis 1 and Revelation 12. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.

Halperin, David J. “Ascension or Invasion: Implications of the Heavenly Journey in Ancient Judaism.” Religion 18, no. 1 (1988): 47–67.

Harrington, Daniel J. A Catholic Reading of the Book of Revelation. Tulsa, OK: University of Tulsa, 1993.

Harris, Gregory H. “The Wound of the Beast in the Tribulation.” Bibliotheca Sacra 156, no. 624 (October 1, 1999): 459–468.

Hartingsveld, L. van. Revelation. Text and Interpretation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1985.

Hitchcock, Mark L. “A Critique of the Preterist View of Revelation 13 and Nero.” Bibliotheca Sacra 164, no. 655 (July 1, 2007): 341–356.

Jenks, Gregory C. The Origins and Early Development of the Antichrist Myth. Beiheft 59. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991.

Johnson, Alan F. Revelation. Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981.

Judge, Edwin A. “The Mark of the Beast, Revelation 13:16.” Tyndale Bulletin 42, no. 1 (May 1, 1991): 158–160.

Keener, Craig S. Revelation. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2000.

———. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993.

Keil, Carl Friedrich. Commentary on the Old Testament in Ten Volumes. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1969.

Kinzig, Wolfram. “The Antecedents of Antichrist: A Traditio-Historical Study of the Earliest Christian Views on Eschatological Opponents.” Theologische Literaturzeitung 126, no. 4 (2001): 417–419.

Kistemaker, Simon. New Testament Commentary: Exposition of the Book of Revelation. New Testament Commentary v. 20. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2001.

Ladd, George Eldon. A Commentary on the Revelation of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1972.

Lee, Dal. Parody and Counterimaging in the Apocalypse. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2002.

Lieu, Judith. I, II & III John: A Commentary. 1st ed. New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.

Lorein, Geert Wouter. The Antichrist Theme in the Intertestamental Period. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 44. New York: T & T Clark International, 2003.

Louw, J. P., and Eugene A. Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies, 1989.

Lunceford, Joe E. Parody and Counterimaging in the Apocalypse. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2009.

Malina, Bruce J. Social-Science Commentary on the Book of Revelation. Social-Science Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2000.

Marshall, I. Howard. 1 and 2 Thessalonians: Based on the Revised Standard Version. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983.

May, David M. “The Empire Strikes Back: The Mark of the Beast in Revelation.” Review & Expositor 106, no. 1 (December 1, 2009): 83–98.

McGinn, Bernard. The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, Vol 2: Apocalypticism in Western History and Culture. New York: Continuum, 1998.

Michaels, J. Ramsey. Revelation. Edited by Grant R. Osborne. The IVP New Testament Commentary Series 20. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1997.

Monera, Arnold T. “The Christian’s Relationship to the State According to the New Testament: Conformity or Non-Conformity?” Asia Journal of Theology 19, no. 1 (April 1, 2005): 106–142.

Morris, Leon. 1, 2 Thessalonians. Word Biblical Themes. Dallas: Word, 1989.

———. The Book of Revelation: An Introduction and Commentary. 2nd ed., rev. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 20. Grand Rapids: InterVarsity Press, 1987.

———. The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.

Mounce, Robert H. The Book of Revelation. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

———. The Book of Revelation. Rev. ed. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

Newell, William R. The Book of the Revelation. Chicago: Grace, 1935.

Osborne, Grant R. Revelation. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 19. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2002.

Peerbolte, L. J. Lietaert. The Antecedents of Antichrist: A Traditio-Historical Study of the Earliest Christian Views on Eschatological Opponents. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996.

Riddlebarger, Kim. The Man of Sin: Uncovering the Truth About the Antichrist. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2006.

Robinson, James M., and Helmut Koester. Trajectories Through Early Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971.

Robinson, John A. T. Redating the New Testament. Westminster Press, 1976.

Roffey, John W. “On Doing Reflection Theology: Poverty and Revelation 13:16-17.” Colloquium 14, no. 2 (May 1, 1982): 51–58.

Rowland, Christopher. Revelation. Epworth Commentaries. London: Epworth Press, 1993.

Ryrie, Charles Caldwell. Revelation. Everyman’s Bible Commentary. Chicago: Moody Press, 1968.

Satre, Lowell J. “Interpreting the Book of Revelation.” Word & World 4, no. 1 (December 1, 1984): 57–69.

Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. The Book of Revelation--Justice and Judgment. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.

Scofield, C. I. The Holy Bible: Containing the Old and New Testaments: Authorized Version: With a New System of Connected Topical References ... New System of Paragraphs. Edited by R. A. Torrey. New and Improved ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1945.

Shoemaker, Steven. “An Antiphonal Litany from Romans 13 and Revelation 13.” Christianity and Crisis 33, no. 10 (June 11, 1973): 109–109.

Shoopman, James. “The Nature of the Beast.” Review & Expositor 106, no. 1 (2009): 67–82.

Smalley, Stephen S. 1, 2, 3 John. Rev. ed. Word Biblical Commentary v. 51. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2007.

———. The Revelation to John: A Commentary on the Greek Text of the Apocalypse. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2005.

Steinmann, Andrew E. “Is the Antichrist in Daniel 11?” Bibliotheca Sacra 162, no. 646 (2005): 195–209.

Thomas, Robert L. Revelation 8-22: An Exegetical Commentary. Chicago: Moody Press, 1995.

Vicchio, Stephen. The Legend of the Anti-Christ: A History. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2009.

Wall, Robert W. Revelation. 18. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1991.

Walvoord, John F. The Revelation of Jesus Christ: A Commentary. Chicago: Moody Press, 1966.

Weinrich, William C., ed. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. Vol. 12. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1998.

———. “Antichrist in the Early Church.” Concordia Theological Quarterly 49, no. 2–3 (1985): 135–147.

———. , ed. Latin Commentaries on Revelation. Ancient Christian Texts. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011.

Williams, Peter J. “P[black Letter]115 and the Number of the Beast.” Tyndale Bulletin 58, no. 1 (January 1, 2007): 151–153.

Witherington, Ben. Revelation. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Wong, Daniel K K. “The Beast from the Sea in Revelation 13.” Bibliotheca Sacra 160, no. 639 (July 1, 2003): 337–348.

Woude, Adam S. van der. “The Origin and Early Development of the Antichrist Myth.” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 24, no. 2 (1993): 305–309.

———. The Book of Daniel in the Light of New Findings. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 106. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1993.







V.        Narrative Analysis

A.        Implied Author and Implied Reader

1.         Implied Author

a.         John, the servant and witness of Jesus Christ, who is also the narrator.

b.         A seer who has received visions from Jesus Christ.

c.         A worshipper of Christ who finds the worship of the beast horrendous.

2.         Implied Reader

a.         Christians in Asia Minor who are either suffering or are about to suffer persecution for their faith in Jesus Christ.

b.         They are possibly being forced to worship a ruler or an image of a ruler and possibly being forced to receive some kind of mark that symbolizes ownership by or loyalty to that ruler.

c.         They need wisdom and understanding.

d.         The implied reader is nearly identical to the narratee since the narrator is very reliable. (Lee, 160)

3.         Narrator (Lee, 152-153, points out four characteristics of the narrator in Revelation):

a.         He is not omniscient but only a witness and thus has no control over the story.

b.         He in not omnipresent. Though he is physically limited to Patmos, he has visions and freely moves between heaven and earth.

c.         He is very reliable, though he does leave some visions unexplained.

d.         He is dramatized as a character in the story and thus has little control over the story. He is not the protagonist, and like all the other characters, he is “flat.”

B.        Point of View

1.         The vision is being told from the first person point of view of John.

2.         Ideologically, the use of the word πλανᾷ implies that the narrator views negatively what this second beast is doing.

3.         Temporally, the use of the present tense (18x) gives the vision a sense of immediacy.

C.        Plot and Narrative Time vs. Story Time

1.         Plot

a.         Beast comes out of the land, makes people worship the first beast, performs signs to deceive them, sets up an image, breathes into it so it speaks, those who refuse to worship it are killed, all are forced to take the mark of the beast, those who don’t can’t buy or sell.

b.         The conflict builds from worship to signs to the image to the mark; forcing everyone to receive the mark of the beast is the climax of this scene.

c.         This scene is the third of seven visions following the seven trumpets. The dragon has pursued the pregnant woman into the desert and the first beast has risen out of the sea. After this scene the 144,000 stand with the Lamb because they have not taken the mark of the beast but have the name of the Father written on their foreheads. Shortly after this a warning is given that all who take the mark of the beast and worship him will be judged by God and thrown into the Lake of Fire.

2.         Narrative Time vs. Story Time

a.         Actual time of events: beast rises out of the land, the sea beast is wounded and healed, signs, image, breathe, mark, and worship.

b.         Worship is moved to the beginning as a summary of what the land beast does, making what follows a description of how he makes that happen.

D.        Setting

1.         Geographical: Asia Minor and the whole earth.

2.         Temporal: the first century AD (or the future?).

3.         Social: all social, economic, and political classes are involved.

E.         Implicit Commentary

1.         Narrative Asides: the narrator calls the readers to have wisdom and understanding in order to calculate the number of the beast.

2.         Irony, Parody, Symbolism, and Repetition

a.         The land beast calls down fire from heaven to deceive the earth-dwellers, but fire from heaven is also involved in several of God’s judgments on the wicked, the way in which the great harlot is destroyed, the means by which God’s enemies are destroyed in the last battle, and the Lake of Fire is the final destiny of the beasts and their followers.

b.         There is irony in the fact that the land beast looks like a lamb but speaks like a dragon.

c.         There is irony in the fact that the land beast has to be given (ἐδόθη) the authority to do his deceptive deeds, implying he is an agent of God’s judgment like those given authority to do harm to the earth before him.

d.         The land beast parodies Christ who is the true lamb and the sea beast parodies Christ who died and came back to life.

e.         The fire from heaven parodies the fire that comes from the mouth of the two witnesses.

f.          The mark of the beast parodies the mark of God on his servants.

g.         Symbolism fills the whole scene and has been dealt with above.

h.         Repetitions: the wound that was healed (2x), signs (2x), worship (2x), on behalf of (2x), and do/make (8x).

F.         Characterization (no dialogue)

1.         God (off stage): God allows (ἐδόθη) the land beast to deceive men.

2.         John: a visionary who worships God and Christ and finds the beasts detestable.

3.         Dragon (off stage): it is implied that he inspires the land beast’s deception.

4.         Sea Beast: fatally wounded with a sword and brought back to life, gives his authority to the land beast, is worshipped by all people, and has a name which is a number that is turned into a mark. (He is proleptically introduced in chapter 11.)

5.         Land Beast: appears as harmless as a lamb outwardly but speaks deceptively and maliciously like a dragon, performs great signs to deceive the people of the earth, subordinate to and derives his authority from the first beast, and works to make the whole earth worship the sea beast and his image and take his mark. Later he is called the false prophet.

6.         Earth-dwellers: naïve and gullible, fearful and compliant, composed of all social, economic and political classes.

7.         God-worshippers: courageous, refuse to worship the beast and his image and take his mark so they are killed or barred from buying and selling.