There are fifteen psalms that are explicitly messianic and quoted in the New Testament.
One of the major types of messianic psalms refers to the anointed king. Kings, priests, and sometimes prophets were anointed in the Old Testament. The Hebrew word, masiah, means to smear or pour oil on someone or something for the sake of consecrating it for God’s use. From the word masiah comes the word Messiah, or Anointed One. The Septuagint either transliterates the word as messias or translates it as christos, from which we get the title Christ, the Anointed One.
The king was anointed at his coronation and thus became the masiah of God. David was keenly aware of his typical role as God’s Anointed representative on the throne and when the psalms speak of the king reigning over the whole earth, it indicates that the earthly king is a type of the heavenly king, who reigns in the heavens over the whole world.
Anointing implies consecration, giving the one anointed a high status (making him sacred so that to do violence to him would be a sacrilege) as well as empowering him to fulfill that sacred duty. The outward ritual was symbolic of the anointed one receiving the gift of God’s Spirit, whose presence made the anointed sacred and empowered.
David clearly saw that the nation’s fortunes were tied up with him, so that what happened to him would affect the entire nation. He also understood that any violence done to him was in effect violence done towards God and his people. David’s experiences, then, become typological of the Messiah’s experiences.
As king, the people could see something of God’s glory in him. He was their shield, as was God. He was God’s son and co-regent with God. However, the king’s failures and shortcomings left the people looking for the One who was to come and be the perfect king, the Messiah.
Psalm 2:7 is one of the verses in the Old Testament quoted most frequently in the New Testament. God promised David that his son Solomon would be the next king, and that He would be his Father and he would be God’s son (2 Samuel 7:14). This sonship is also referred to in Psalm 110, and this psalm is quoted by Jesus to show that David realized that even though the king enjoyed a special status as God’s son, there was another Son, higher than he, sitting at God’s right hand. Hebrews 1:13 draws a further contrast by showing that not even the angels have ever received the privilege to sit at God’s right hand, but only to stand before him. Paul, in Romans 1:4 states that Christ was demonstrated to be this Son when he was resurrected from the dead by the power of God. Paul builds on this image in Ephesians 4:8-11 where he quotes Psalm 68:18 to show that Christ ascended into heaven leading a host of captives and giving the gifts of the Spirit to his church. Psalm 45:6 clearly calls this figure on the throne God, indicating that the Messiah is a divine figure, as Hebrews 1:8 points out.
Another Messianic title in the psalms is “my servant,” used by David while in distress (69:17; 86:2, 4, 16) but also in the headings of several psalms to designate himself (18, 36). Most of the quotations from the psalms in the New Testament concerning Christ’s suffering and death come from psalms using this title for the Messiah (22, 35, 40, 41, 109, 118).
Other titles allude to the Messiah and are picked up by the New Testament as well. The high status of “man” is typological of Messiah, as is the high priest after the order of Melchizedek (Genesis 14:18ff; Psalm 110; Hebrews 8-10). Jesus is also called the “stone the builders rejected” (118:22) who has become the chief corner stone.
While there are fifteen psalms that explicitly refer to the Messiah, it is clear from the New Testament that Christ is seen in many more psalms implicitly. The fact that the New Testament writers don’t take the time to explain, let alone prove, that the psalms they are quoting refer to Jesus, implies that there was a wide spread acceptance of this idea already in the early church. This is most likely due to the fact of Jesus’ teaching after his resurrection (cf. Luke 24) where he explains how the whole Old Testament refers to him.
Much of this material was adapted from Derek Kidner’s commentary, Psalms: An Introduction and Commentary, vol. 1, pages 18-24.
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Imprecatory Psalms
How can we as Christians understand and use the fiery imprecations that we find in the Psalms?
First of all, we need to understand the imprecatory psalms as a plea for justice to be done and for wrongs to be righted. This is certainly a sentiment that even the New Testament expresses (Luke 18:1-8), where not only is there a concern for clearing one’s name but a call for retribution within the context of the legal system. It must be emphasized that the imprecations in the psalms are not expressions of personal vindictiveness but a sincere, heartfelt cry for justice.
Second, we need to realize that the New Testament has a much fuller revelation than what was available to the psalmists. The cross brings in a whole new dynamic in the way that we relate to those who wrong us as well as an assurance that evil will ultimately be dealt with.
Third, we find that the imprecations range all the way from plaintive to ferocious. The intensity of the imprecation reflects the intensity of the evil that has been suffered. The psalmists were responding to having their friends respond to their love with brutality (109:4) or their enemies brutally take advantage of their weakness (137). The greater the offense the more intense the cry for vengeance.
Fourth, imprecations must be interpreted in accordance with the rules of rhetoric that govern this genre. Just as proverbs, parables, epistles, apocalyptic and gospels are separate genres with unique attributes that need to be understood properly in order to interpret them correctly, so too imprecations are a separate genre with peculiar attributes that need special attention when being interpreted. An imprecation is a form of hyperbole, a poetic device that crosses over the line of cautious literalism. Imprecations are designed to elicit an intense emotional response from the reader, not impart cold, rational facts. It seeks to kindle in the reader the same emotional response to injustice as the one suffering it experienced. Thus, it is indirect yet very intimate. There are times when we can calmly discuss evil and injustice, but there are also times when we need to experience the full force of evil and injustice as if it were happening to us. Imprecations can do that while calm discourse cannot.
Fifth, other biblical figures, such as Jeremiah and Job, wrestled with deep emotional responses to severe pain, suffering and injustice. In response to their intense expressions of pain and despair, God listens to the whole man and the whole message, acknowledging both the content and the emotion, rebuking when the line is crossed while agreeing with what is true in their complaints (see Jeremiah 12:5; 11:20-23; 12:7ff; Job 38:2; 42:7). God, then, is able to handle the complaints of his saints and is compassionate enough to listen to our hearts and not simply our words.
Sixth, the New Testament focuses on grace and forgiveness, where the Gospel is preached to all, especially to sinners. However, in championing God’s love it doesn’t eliminate God’s wrath, but both are held in balance by the cross. While some quotations of the psalms in the New Testament stop short of the imprecations, those who reject Christ and his message are said to have earned a fate worse than Sodom’s. In fact, God’s wrath and the iron rod of the Messiah of Psalm 2 are clearly prominent in Revelation, “the day of his wrath” (110:5) is found in Romans 2:5, and the anger called down on those “who do not know” God (79:6) is confirmed in 2 Thessalonians 1:8. In fact, often the punishment meted out in the New Testament is much more severe than the vindication called for in the quoted psalm (compare Matthew 7:23 with Psalm 6:8). Therefore, it is too simplistic to say that the God of the Old Testament is a wrathful God while the God of the New Testament is a God of love. God is loving, merciful and forgiving in both testaments just as he is just, righteous and an avenger of evil in both testaments. Therefore, while the call for forgiveness is much stronger in the New Testament, God’s wrath is still evident for those who reject that forgiveness and persist in their evil.
Seventh, pleas for vindication can sometimes be viewed as the fact of innocent blood “crying” like Abel’s “from the ground to God.” Injustice and bloodshed are evil and must be vindicated. Any moral system that does not call evil “evil” is self-destructive and harmful. Calls for vindication in this sense are never expressions of personal vindictiveness or vigilante justice, but the cry of justice and righteousness to prevail against the forces of evil. Anyone who would deny this cry is on the wrong side.
Eighth, the Christian today can still profit from the imprecatory psalms in several ways. Because we have a fuller revelation we cannot cry out for vindication in the same way as the psalmists, but we can express our pain and suffering to God while at the same time blessing those who persecute us and praying for those who are treating us unjustly. We can also profit from the imprecations if we allow them to hit us with their full emotional force, deepening our appreciation for the pain and suffering of those who are being treated unjustly, moving our hearts to act with compassion to seek justice in our own world. The imprecatory psalms can also remind us that God’s judgment on sin and evil is real and there will be a day when all the evil in the world will be dealt with and all the wrongs will be righted, so that justice and righteousness will reign like the noon-day sun.
While the imprecatory psalms may make us feel uneasy and not seem relevant to our modern world and the age of grace, it should remind us that we must remain on the side of justice and righteousness and not use the weapons of evil to inflict pain and suffering on those around us. While we need to patiently endure injustice, love our enemies, and trust God to right the wrongs done to us, we also need to be reminded that if we are not careful, we may find ourselves on the wrong side of justice as the perpetrators of injustice and the subjects of someone else’s imprecations.
Much of this material was adapted from Derek Kidner’s commentary, Psalms: An Introduction and Commentary, vol. 1, pages 25-32.
First of all, we need to understand the imprecatory psalms as a plea for justice to be done and for wrongs to be righted. This is certainly a sentiment that even the New Testament expresses (Luke 18:1-8), where not only is there a concern for clearing one’s name but a call for retribution within the context of the legal system. It must be emphasized that the imprecations in the psalms are not expressions of personal vindictiveness but a sincere, heartfelt cry for justice.
Second, we need to realize that the New Testament has a much fuller revelation than what was available to the psalmists. The cross brings in a whole new dynamic in the way that we relate to those who wrong us as well as an assurance that evil will ultimately be dealt with.
Third, we find that the imprecations range all the way from plaintive to ferocious. The intensity of the imprecation reflects the intensity of the evil that has been suffered. The psalmists were responding to having their friends respond to their love with brutality (109:4) or their enemies brutally take advantage of their weakness (137). The greater the offense the more intense the cry for vengeance.
Fourth, imprecations must be interpreted in accordance with the rules of rhetoric that govern this genre. Just as proverbs, parables, epistles, apocalyptic and gospels are separate genres with unique attributes that need to be understood properly in order to interpret them correctly, so too imprecations are a separate genre with peculiar attributes that need special attention when being interpreted. An imprecation is a form of hyperbole, a poetic device that crosses over the line of cautious literalism. Imprecations are designed to elicit an intense emotional response from the reader, not impart cold, rational facts. It seeks to kindle in the reader the same emotional response to injustice as the one suffering it experienced. Thus, it is indirect yet very intimate. There are times when we can calmly discuss evil and injustice, but there are also times when we need to experience the full force of evil and injustice as if it were happening to us. Imprecations can do that while calm discourse cannot.
Fifth, other biblical figures, such as Jeremiah and Job, wrestled with deep emotional responses to severe pain, suffering and injustice. In response to their intense expressions of pain and despair, God listens to the whole man and the whole message, acknowledging both the content and the emotion, rebuking when the line is crossed while agreeing with what is true in their complaints (see Jeremiah 12:5; 11:20-23; 12:7ff; Job 38:2; 42:7). God, then, is able to handle the complaints of his saints and is compassionate enough to listen to our hearts and not simply our words.
Sixth, the New Testament focuses on grace and forgiveness, where the Gospel is preached to all, especially to sinners. However, in championing God’s love it doesn’t eliminate God’s wrath, but both are held in balance by the cross. While some quotations of the psalms in the New Testament stop short of the imprecations, those who reject Christ and his message are said to have earned a fate worse than Sodom’s. In fact, God’s wrath and the iron rod of the Messiah of Psalm 2 are clearly prominent in Revelation, “the day of his wrath” (110:5) is found in Romans 2:5, and the anger called down on those “who do not know” God (79:6) is confirmed in 2 Thessalonians 1:8. In fact, often the punishment meted out in the New Testament is much more severe than the vindication called for in the quoted psalm (compare Matthew 7:23 with Psalm 6:8). Therefore, it is too simplistic to say that the God of the Old Testament is a wrathful God while the God of the New Testament is a God of love. God is loving, merciful and forgiving in both testaments just as he is just, righteous and an avenger of evil in both testaments. Therefore, while the call for forgiveness is much stronger in the New Testament, God’s wrath is still evident for those who reject that forgiveness and persist in their evil.
Seventh, pleas for vindication can sometimes be viewed as the fact of innocent blood “crying” like Abel’s “from the ground to God.” Injustice and bloodshed are evil and must be vindicated. Any moral system that does not call evil “evil” is self-destructive and harmful. Calls for vindication in this sense are never expressions of personal vindictiveness or vigilante justice, but the cry of justice and righteousness to prevail against the forces of evil. Anyone who would deny this cry is on the wrong side.
Eighth, the Christian today can still profit from the imprecatory psalms in several ways. Because we have a fuller revelation we cannot cry out for vindication in the same way as the psalmists, but we can express our pain and suffering to God while at the same time blessing those who persecute us and praying for those who are treating us unjustly. We can also profit from the imprecations if we allow them to hit us with their full emotional force, deepening our appreciation for the pain and suffering of those who are being treated unjustly, moving our hearts to act with compassion to seek justice in our own world. The imprecatory psalms can also remind us that God’s judgment on sin and evil is real and there will be a day when all the evil in the world will be dealt with and all the wrongs will be righted, so that justice and righteousness will reign like the noon-day sun.
While the imprecatory psalms may make us feel uneasy and not seem relevant to our modern world and the age of grace, it should remind us that we must remain on the side of justice and righteousness and not use the weapons of evil to inflict pain and suffering on those around us. While we need to patiently endure injustice, love our enemies, and trust God to right the wrongs done to us, we also need to be reminded that if we are not careful, we may find ourselves on the wrong side of justice as the perpetrators of injustice and the subjects of someone else’s imprecations.
Much of this material was adapted from Derek Kidner’s commentary, Psalms: An Introduction and Commentary, vol. 1, pages 25-32.
Sunday, August 5, 2007
Second Clement
Second Clement is the oldest extant Christian sermon outside the New Testament. It is not a letter nor was it written by Clement but is a transcription of a sermon by an anonymous presbyter based on Isaiah 54:1. In all the extant manuscripts Second Clement always follows First Clement, indicating that the sermon may have been preached in Corinth, or sent to Corinth for some reason. The text has been dated anywhere from A.D. 100 to 120.
Outline Summary by Chapters:
1. Praise for God’s salvation, calling us out of idolatry in order to serve him through Jesus Christ.
2. He quotes Isaiah 54:1 and interprets in a way that applies to the hearers’ present circumstances: The barren woman without children was the church who now has children through Christ’s work on the cross. The call for the woman who has no labor pains to rejoice is a call to the church to praise God for salvation. The phrase concerning the deserted woman having more children than the one having a husband refers to the fact that the church now has more believers than the Jews.
3. The preacher quotes Jesus’ words about men acknowledging him and the need to do it from the heart and not merely from the lips (Matthew 10:32 and 12:30) , indicating that we will be rewarded if we truly acknowledge Christ and not be like the people predicted by Isaiah 29:13 (quoted by Jesus in Matthew 15:8) who merely honor God with their lips and not their hearts.
4. It is not enough to merely call him “Lord” but we must show it in our actions by loving each other (quoting Matthew 7:21).
5. The preacher admonishes his hearers to not hold onto this world but live for the world to come. He quotes Jesus telling his disciples that they will be like lambs among wolves (Luke 10:13; Matthew 10:16, 28; Luke 12:4-5). He then quotes from the Gospel of the Egyptians where Peter asks, “What if the wolves tear the lambs to pieces?” To which Jesus replies that we should not fear those who can destroy the body but not the soul; rather we should fear God who can destroy both in hell.
6. He then quotes Jesus’ saying that we cannot serve two masters (Matthew 16:26; Mark 8:36; Luke 9:25), so believers should not be friends with the world.
7. He then uses the analogy of a earthly race or contest and the need to compete by the rules, lest one should be punished. He doesn't quote Paul but it appears he was familiar with several of Paul’s uses of the race metaphor.
8. There is a call to repent because once you die you will no longer have a chance to repent. He quotes from the Gospel of the Egyptians and possibly Luke 16:10-12. There is also an allusion to the potter and the clay of Isaiah 45:9.
9. The preacher emphasizes the fact that we are flesh and will be resurrected again in the flesh to face judgment. Jesus himself was a spirit who became flesh (wn men to prwton pneuma, egeneto sarx), so we too must repent now in the flesh so we may enter the kingdom of God.
10. The preacher calls his hearers to forsake sin and ungodliness: “let us abandon that evil mindset, the forerunner of our sins, and flee ungodliness lest evil things overtake us.” If we do good, we will have peace; if we do evil we will never find peace.
11. He quotes several passages from an unknown source to challenge his readers to remain true to the faith and not be double-minded.
12. He urges his hearers to wait patiently for the kingdom of God since we don’t know the day of God’s appearing (epeidh ouk oidamen thn hmeran thß epifaneisaß tou qeou). He then quotes from the Gospel of the Egyptians or the Gospel of Thomas but completely misinterprets it.
13. He gives another call to repentance because their sinful lifestyle is causing God’s name to be blasphemed (Isaiah 52:5). Instead, we should live lives of extraordinary goodness so people will marvel and praise God (Luke 6:32, 35).
14. We must take care not to defile the church, which is the flesh while Christ is the spirit. The church has existed from the beginning and was spiritual and was revealed in the flesh of Christ (efanerwqh en th sarki Cristou). Therefore, whoever abuses the church abuses Christ.
15. Those who repent will be rewarded as will the one who calls them to repentance. God is eager to answer our prayer (Isaiah 58:9).
16. Repent while you have a chance for the day of judgment is coming like a blazing furnace (Malachi 4:1) and this world will be destroyed (Isaiah 34:4). This seems to echo 2 Peter 3:10-12. Repentance, fasting, prayer, and charitable giving should be practiced in order to secure God’s blessing.
17. Repent and call others to repent because those caught up in worldly pleasures will be judged in the fires of hell, where “their worm will not die and their fire will not be quenched, and they will be a spectacle for all flesh” (Isaiah 66:18, 24).
18. The preacher then confesses his own sinfulness and his present struggle against sin and evil as an encouragement for his hearers to pursue righteousness and escape the coming judgment.
19. The preacher reads the scriptural exhortation and encourages his hearers to take the calls to repentance seriously and continue to seek righteousness even if it results in present suffering.
20. Patience and endurance is essential since none of the righteous ever received his reward quickly. Nor should be do it simply for the reward but out of sincerity and love for God. He then ends with a benediction, invoking the name of God as “To the only God, invisible” as a quote of 1 Timothy 1:17.
This sermon gives us glimpse into the worship of the church, which appears at least in this instance, to center on the reading of scripture (here an Old Testament text), followed by a sermon filled with scriptural quotes and allusions, some from the Old Testament, some from the New Testament, and others from texts not in the canon. This sermon focused primarily upon a call to repentance and a turning from sin.
This sermon also shows that the divinity and humanity of Christ were considered fundamental truths, though the relationship of the Son to the Father is not address, nor is the relationship of the two natures of Christ. This sermon seems to be refuting Docetism, which saw Christ as a spirit who only appeared to have a body (cf. 1 John which also deals extensively with this issue).
One issue for further research would be whether this is the full text of the sermon or an abridged transcription. It has the feel of a spoken message while the ideas don’t seem to be fully developed, nor is there always a smooth transition from one idea to another.
Outline Summary by Chapters:
1. Praise for God’s salvation, calling us out of idolatry in order to serve him through Jesus Christ.
2. He quotes Isaiah 54:1 and interprets in a way that applies to the hearers’ present circumstances: The barren woman without children was the church who now has children through Christ’s work on the cross. The call for the woman who has no labor pains to rejoice is a call to the church to praise God for salvation. The phrase concerning the deserted woman having more children than the one having a husband refers to the fact that the church now has more believers than the Jews.
3. The preacher quotes Jesus’ words about men acknowledging him and the need to do it from the heart and not merely from the lips (Matthew 10:32 and 12:30) , indicating that we will be rewarded if we truly acknowledge Christ and not be like the people predicted by Isaiah 29:13 (quoted by Jesus in Matthew 15:8) who merely honor God with their lips and not their hearts.
4. It is not enough to merely call him “Lord” but we must show it in our actions by loving each other (quoting Matthew 7:21).
5. The preacher admonishes his hearers to not hold onto this world but live for the world to come. He quotes Jesus telling his disciples that they will be like lambs among wolves (Luke 10:13; Matthew 10:16, 28; Luke 12:4-5). He then quotes from the Gospel of the Egyptians where Peter asks, “What if the wolves tear the lambs to pieces?” To which Jesus replies that we should not fear those who can destroy the body but not the soul; rather we should fear God who can destroy both in hell.
6. He then quotes Jesus’ saying that we cannot serve two masters (Matthew 16:26; Mark 8:36; Luke 9:25), so believers should not be friends with the world.
7. He then uses the analogy of a earthly race or contest and the need to compete by the rules, lest one should be punished. He doesn't quote Paul but it appears he was familiar with several of Paul’s uses of the race metaphor.
8. There is a call to repent because once you die you will no longer have a chance to repent. He quotes from the Gospel of the Egyptians and possibly Luke 16:10-12. There is also an allusion to the potter and the clay of Isaiah 45:9.
9. The preacher emphasizes the fact that we are flesh and will be resurrected again in the flesh to face judgment. Jesus himself was a spirit who became flesh (wn men to prwton pneuma, egeneto sarx), so we too must repent now in the flesh so we may enter the kingdom of God.
10. The preacher calls his hearers to forsake sin and ungodliness: “let us abandon that evil mindset, the forerunner of our sins, and flee ungodliness lest evil things overtake us.” If we do good, we will have peace; if we do evil we will never find peace.
11. He quotes several passages from an unknown source to challenge his readers to remain true to the faith and not be double-minded.
12. He urges his hearers to wait patiently for the kingdom of God since we don’t know the day of God’s appearing (epeidh ouk oidamen thn hmeran thß epifaneisaß tou qeou). He then quotes from the Gospel of the Egyptians or the Gospel of Thomas but completely misinterprets it.
13. He gives another call to repentance because their sinful lifestyle is causing God’s name to be blasphemed (Isaiah 52:5). Instead, we should live lives of extraordinary goodness so people will marvel and praise God (Luke 6:32, 35).
14. We must take care not to defile the church, which is the flesh while Christ is the spirit. The church has existed from the beginning and was spiritual and was revealed in the flesh of Christ (efanerwqh en th sarki Cristou). Therefore, whoever abuses the church abuses Christ.
15. Those who repent will be rewarded as will the one who calls them to repentance. God is eager to answer our prayer (Isaiah 58:9).
16. Repent while you have a chance for the day of judgment is coming like a blazing furnace (Malachi 4:1) and this world will be destroyed (Isaiah 34:4). This seems to echo 2 Peter 3:10-12. Repentance, fasting, prayer, and charitable giving should be practiced in order to secure God’s blessing.
17. Repent and call others to repent because those caught up in worldly pleasures will be judged in the fires of hell, where “their worm will not die and their fire will not be quenched, and they will be a spectacle for all flesh” (Isaiah 66:18, 24).
18. The preacher then confesses his own sinfulness and his present struggle against sin and evil as an encouragement for his hearers to pursue righteousness and escape the coming judgment.
19. The preacher reads the scriptural exhortation and encourages his hearers to take the calls to repentance seriously and continue to seek righteousness even if it results in present suffering.
20. Patience and endurance is essential since none of the righteous ever received his reward quickly. Nor should be do it simply for the reward but out of sincerity and love for God. He then ends with a benediction, invoking the name of God as “To the only God, invisible” as a quote of 1 Timothy 1:17.
This sermon gives us glimpse into the worship of the church, which appears at least in this instance, to center on the reading of scripture (here an Old Testament text), followed by a sermon filled with scriptural quotes and allusions, some from the Old Testament, some from the New Testament, and others from texts not in the canon. This sermon focused primarily upon a call to repentance and a turning from sin.
This sermon also shows that the divinity and humanity of Christ were considered fundamental truths, though the relationship of the Son to the Father is not address, nor is the relationship of the two natures of Christ. This sermon seems to be refuting Docetism, which saw Christ as a spirit who only appeared to have a body (cf. 1 John which also deals extensively with this issue).
One issue for further research would be whether this is the full text of the sermon or an abridged transcription. It has the feel of a spoken message while the ideas don’t seem to be fully developed, nor is there always a smooth transition from one idea to another.
Saturday, August 4, 2007
First Clement
First Clement was written by the church in Rome to the church in Corinth and is most likely the earliest extant Christian document outside the New Testament. It was written in Rome near the end of the first century, about the same time the apostle John was writing the book of Revelation, around A.D. 95 or 96, in the last year of the emperor Domitian or the first year of emperor Nerva. The author of this letter is unknown to us, and though the letter claims to be the work of the whole church, tradition identifies the author as some named Clement, who tradition claims was the third bishop of Rome after Peter. However, historical evidence suggests that Rome still had a plurality of elders who governed the church at this time, so Clement was most likely the leading elder and not the sole leader.
The letter was written because a certain faction, composed mainly of younger men, in Corinth had ousted the duly appointed bishop of the church. When news of this reached Rome, the church wrote this letter to admonish the faction to step down and reinstate the duly appointed bishop. The church in Rome also dispatched mediators to Corinth to restore peace and proper order.
This letter was held in high regard in the early church and was quoted from frequently. Clement of Alexandria even quotes it as authoritative scripture. This letter even made it into some early copies of the New Testament, so the early church had great respect for this letter.
The first sentence in chapter 1 indicates that there was some trouble in Rome that hindered an immediate response: “Because of the sudden and repeated misfortunes and reverses which have happened to us, brothers, we acknowledge that we have been somewhat slow in giving attention to the matters in dispute among you, dear friends, especially the detestable and unholy schism, so alien and strange to those chosen by God, which a few reckless and arrogant persons have kindled to such a pitch of insanity that your good name, once so renowned and loved by all, has been greatly reviled.”
The letter goes on to challenge the usurpers to submit to the duly established leadership as is fitting and proper. The letter then refers to a few instances of rebellion in the Old Testament, such as Cain’s murder of Abel, Jacob and Esau, Moses and the rejection of his early leadership by those who knew he killed the Egyptian master, Miriam and Aaron opposing Moses, and David being persecuted by Saul. The letter then gives sever current examples, such as Peter and Paul who were martyred for their faith, and several women who were persecuted named Danaids and Dircae.
One interesting note is that Paul is said to have “reached the farthest limits of the West” and “when he had given his testimony before the rulers, he thus departed from the world and wen tot he holy place.…” This implies that Paul reached his goal of bringing the gospel to Spain after his imprisonment in Rome. It also implies that he was able to present his defense to Caesar, most likely explaining the gospel to all who were present, and that he was found not guilty and set free.
The letter goes on to warn the Corinthians that such rebellion and factiousness has always been punished. Therefore, the letters calls for the rebels to repent and restore the original leaders. Several examples from the Old Testament of faithful people, who were saved because of their hospitality and generosity, are held up as models for them to imitate, such as Abraham, Lot, Rahab. The letter calls for the church in Corinth to humble itself, repent, and be obedient to God and not follow the arrogant rebels. Christ is then held up as an example of humility and submission to God to follow. Elijah, Elisha, Ezekiel, Job, Moses, and David are also held up as examples to follow. Then the fact that even creation obeys God and follows his decrees is given as a reason to submit to God in this matter. The letter goes on for many more chapters giving exhortations and reasons to repent and submit to God’s order for the church.
One important passage (chapter 44) indicates that the apostles had appointed leaders in the churches and that these leaders were to be honored and obeyed: “Our apostles likewise knew, through our Lord Jesus Christ, that there would be strife over the bishop’s office. For this reason, therefore, having received complete foreknowledge, they appointed the officials mentioned earlier and afterwards they gave the offices a permanent character, that is, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry. Those, therefore, who were appointed by them or, later on, by other reputable men with the consent of the whole church, and who have ministered to the flock of Christ blamelessly, humbly, peaceably, and unselfishly, and for a long time have been well spoken of by all—these men we consider to be unjustly removed from their ministry.”
This passage indicates that by the end of the first century, only sixty to seventy years after Christ’s death and resurrection, there was a clear understanding that leadership was, first of all, appointed by the apostles, and second, that those men would have the authority to choose successors, and third, the whole church had to agree on those choices. Therefore, an established leadership was already taking shape immediately after the apostolic period.
The young men in the church of Corinth had clearly gone against this tradition. They had no authority to depose the current leadership, nor did they have the authority to appoint themselves. The church should have resisted such attempts, but it failed to follow the pattern given by the apostles, resulting in schisms and confusion.
In Chapter 47, the letter refers to the apostle Paul’s teaching, calling for them to submit to his authority. In chapter 48 the letter calls for them to quickly root out this offense and pray for forgiveness, so God may be merciful and restore them. The following chapters focus on the need for love and calls the church to show love and not be divided. The letter ends with several chapters of appeal to the rebellious to repent and restore the leadership and seek God’s forgiveness.
This letter also shows us the beginning of the church of Rome’s slow climb to supremacy and dominance over the other churches. The church in Rome saw it fitting to exert its influence over another church in a different region. While it would take centuries before the church in Rome became the leading church and its bishop the leading bishop, it seems that the seeds for that domination began early on as is evident in this letter. This letter also clearly sets up the idea of apostolic succession, with the first bishops being established by the apostles, and the succeeding bishops being established by those bishops, on down through a line of unbroken apostolic succession. While it is evident that this is how it happened historically, it doesn’t mean that Christ or the apostles intended for the bishop of Rome to have dominance over all the other churches. It would seem that the plan was to insure local autonomy not hegemony by one church.
The letter was written because a certain faction, composed mainly of younger men, in Corinth had ousted the duly appointed bishop of the church. When news of this reached Rome, the church wrote this letter to admonish the faction to step down and reinstate the duly appointed bishop. The church in Rome also dispatched mediators to Corinth to restore peace and proper order.
This letter was held in high regard in the early church and was quoted from frequently. Clement of Alexandria even quotes it as authoritative scripture. This letter even made it into some early copies of the New Testament, so the early church had great respect for this letter.
The first sentence in chapter 1 indicates that there was some trouble in Rome that hindered an immediate response: “Because of the sudden and repeated misfortunes and reverses which have happened to us, brothers, we acknowledge that we have been somewhat slow in giving attention to the matters in dispute among you, dear friends, especially the detestable and unholy schism, so alien and strange to those chosen by God, which a few reckless and arrogant persons have kindled to such a pitch of insanity that your good name, once so renowned and loved by all, has been greatly reviled.”
The letter goes on to challenge the usurpers to submit to the duly established leadership as is fitting and proper. The letter then refers to a few instances of rebellion in the Old Testament, such as Cain’s murder of Abel, Jacob and Esau, Moses and the rejection of his early leadership by those who knew he killed the Egyptian master, Miriam and Aaron opposing Moses, and David being persecuted by Saul. The letter then gives sever current examples, such as Peter and Paul who were martyred for their faith, and several women who were persecuted named Danaids and Dircae.
One interesting note is that Paul is said to have “reached the farthest limits of the West” and “when he had given his testimony before the rulers, he thus departed from the world and wen tot he holy place.…” This implies that Paul reached his goal of bringing the gospel to Spain after his imprisonment in Rome. It also implies that he was able to present his defense to Caesar, most likely explaining the gospel to all who were present, and that he was found not guilty and set free.
The letter goes on to warn the Corinthians that such rebellion and factiousness has always been punished. Therefore, the letters calls for the rebels to repent and restore the original leaders. Several examples from the Old Testament of faithful people, who were saved because of their hospitality and generosity, are held up as models for them to imitate, such as Abraham, Lot, Rahab. The letter calls for the church in Corinth to humble itself, repent, and be obedient to God and not follow the arrogant rebels. Christ is then held up as an example of humility and submission to God to follow. Elijah, Elisha, Ezekiel, Job, Moses, and David are also held up as examples to follow. Then the fact that even creation obeys God and follows his decrees is given as a reason to submit to God in this matter. The letter goes on for many more chapters giving exhortations and reasons to repent and submit to God’s order for the church.
One important passage (chapter 44) indicates that the apostles had appointed leaders in the churches and that these leaders were to be honored and obeyed: “Our apostles likewise knew, through our Lord Jesus Christ, that there would be strife over the bishop’s office. For this reason, therefore, having received complete foreknowledge, they appointed the officials mentioned earlier and afterwards they gave the offices a permanent character, that is, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry. Those, therefore, who were appointed by them or, later on, by other reputable men with the consent of the whole church, and who have ministered to the flock of Christ blamelessly, humbly, peaceably, and unselfishly, and for a long time have been well spoken of by all—these men we consider to be unjustly removed from their ministry.”
This passage indicates that by the end of the first century, only sixty to seventy years after Christ’s death and resurrection, there was a clear understanding that leadership was, first of all, appointed by the apostles, and second, that those men would have the authority to choose successors, and third, the whole church had to agree on those choices. Therefore, an established leadership was already taking shape immediately after the apostolic period.
The young men in the church of Corinth had clearly gone against this tradition. They had no authority to depose the current leadership, nor did they have the authority to appoint themselves. The church should have resisted such attempts, but it failed to follow the pattern given by the apostles, resulting in schisms and confusion.
In Chapter 47, the letter refers to the apostle Paul’s teaching, calling for them to submit to his authority. In chapter 48 the letter calls for them to quickly root out this offense and pray for forgiveness, so God may be merciful and restore them. The following chapters focus on the need for love and calls the church to show love and not be divided. The letter ends with several chapters of appeal to the rebellious to repent and restore the leadership and seek God’s forgiveness.
This letter also shows us the beginning of the church of Rome’s slow climb to supremacy and dominance over the other churches. The church in Rome saw it fitting to exert its influence over another church in a different region. While it would take centuries before the church in Rome became the leading church and its bishop the leading bishop, it seems that the seeds for that domination began early on as is evident in this letter. This letter also clearly sets up the idea of apostolic succession, with the first bishops being established by the apostles, and the succeeding bishops being established by those bishops, on down through a line of unbroken apostolic succession. While it is evident that this is how it happened historically, it doesn’t mean that Christ or the apostles intended for the bishop of Rome to have dominance over all the other churches. It would seem that the plan was to insure local autonomy not hegemony by one church.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)