Showing posts with label Language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Language. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Thucydides: When Civilization Tears Itself Apart and the Hope of the Gospel

Imagine watching your neighbors, your colleagues, perhaps even members of your own family, turn on one another with a ferocity you once thought impossible. Imagine watching the very words you have relied on your whole life — courage, justice, loyalty, truth — stripped of their meaning and reassigned to cover their opposites, so that you no longer share a moral language with the people around you. This is not a description of a dystopian novel. It is what Thucydides, the Athenian historian who lived through the Peloponnesian War, recorded when he turned his gaze to the island of Corcyra in the fifth century before Christ. In the third book of his History of the Peloponnesian War, he produced an account of factional civil strife so precise, so penetrating, and so deeply confirmed by everything Scripture teaches about the human heart that Christians who ignore it do so at their own impoverishment. What you are about to read is not merely ancient history. It is a mirror held up to every civilization that has ever unraveled, including the one in which you live right now.


A Violent Teacher: The Historical Setting of Civil Strife

Corcyra — modern Corfu — was a strategically vital island colony caught between the rival power blocs of Athens and Sparta. When external war pressure intensified, the island’s internal divisions between pro-Athenian democrats and pro-Spartan oligarchs exploded into open violence. Thucydides had watched the Athenian plague strip away his city’s social fabric, observed the cold execution of the Plataeans, and seen brutality spread like contagion from city to city across the Greek world. What he saw was not merely military conflict but a revelation: war, he wrote, is a violent teacher. It does not create the darkness in human beings; it removes the structures that kept the darkness contained. The restraints of law, custom, religion, and civic trust that normally hold a society together proved, under sufficient pressure, to be far thinner than anyone had imagined.


Homer, Tragedy, and the Inversion of Heroism: Literary Backgrounds

Thucydides wrote in full awareness of his literary predecessors, and his account of the Corcyraean stasis achieves its power in part by deliberately inverting the values that Homeric epic had celebrated for centuries. Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey had held up courage, honor, loyalty, and wisdom as the defining marks of great men. Thucydides shows war doing exactly the opposite: stripping those virtues away and replacing them with their corrupted counterfeits. Reckless audacity is redefined as courage. Genuine moderation is denounced as cowardice. The prudence Odysseus embodied is dismissed as unmanliness. Where Herodotus had documented how different cultures maintained different customs under normal conditions, Thucydides goes further and shows how a single culture, under sufficient stress, dismantles its own customs from within. The Greeks had spent centuries celebrating heroism in poetry and drama. Thucydides used all of that literary inheritance to produce what none of those traditions had managed alone — a clinical account of how heroism dies, and what takes its place.


The Language of Collapse: Theological and Ethical Analysis

The most remarkable passage in Thucydides’ account is his analysis of what happened to language. In the Corcyraean civil war, the customary valuation of words in relation to deeds was exchanged for new justifications — words were forcibly reassigned to cover their opposites. Consider what that means for daily life. Every conversation becomes a negotiation in which you cannot be certain that the words your neighbor uses carry the meanings you assign them. Trust — which is nothing other than the ability to predict that words mean what they say — evaporates, and once trust evaporates, every institution that depends on it follows. Thucydides records fathers killing sons and sons killing fathers, because factional loyalty overwhelmed every other bond. Temples were violated and oaths broken, because the fear of the gods that once checked human behavior was suspended when the passions ran hot enough. Thucydides locates the engine of this catastrophe in physis — human nature itself — which he presents not as something war creates but as something war reveals. The capacity for this horror was always there. Civilization had simply kept it covered.


What the Prophets Saw: Old Testament Connections

The reader who comes to Thucydides after living in the Old Testament will find the landscape immediately familiar, though the cartography is entirely different. Isaiah cried out against those who call evil good and good evil, and his words could serve as a caption for Thucydides’ account of the Corcyraean language inversions. Jeremiah lamented a society in which every neighbor was a deceiver and every brother a supplanter. Micah catalogued the collapse of justice and the dissolution of family loyalty. Psalm 55 gives the inner experience of that dissolution — the psalmist’s anguish that his familiar friend, with whom he had walked in the house of God, had turned against him. The pattern Thucydides observed in fifth-century Greece is the pattern the prophets observed across centuries of Israel’s history, and that convergence is not coincidental. Both the historian and the prophets were observing the same underlying reality: the fruit of human fallenness working itself out in social structures. But here the two traditions diverge sharply. For Thucydides, stasis is a feature of human nature that no remedy permanently overcomes. For the prophets, societal collapse was judgment for covenant breaking, and its remedy was not better political management but repentance, covenant restoration, and the messianic hope that would one day renew human nature from the inside out. Thucydides diagnoses with genius. The prophets diagnose with divine authority and point to a cure.


What Paul Knew That Thucydides Could Not: New Testament Connections

Paul’s great argument in Romans 1 traces precisely the same arc Thucydides observed — the progressive inversion of values that follows from the suppression of truth — but with a theological precision no secular historian could supply. Paul shows that the inversion does not begin in politics or culture but in worship: when human beings suppress the truth about God and exchange his glory for created substitutes, the moral order built on his character begins to invert around that central act of substitution. The social consequences Paul catalogues — deceit, malice, murder, strife, faithlessness, cruelty — read like a compressed summary of the Corcyraean stasis. James, writing to churches already exhibiting stasis-like symptoms, asked with pastoral directness: What causes wars and factions among you? Is it not your passions that are at war within you? Both writers confirm that what Thucydides saw in Corcyra was not a Greek peculiarity but a universal human condition with a universal human cause. What no Greek philosopher could provide, Paul and James supply: not merely a diagnosis but a gospel. The same God whose character is the permanent standard against which all moral inversions stand exposed has acted in Jesus Christ to do what no political arrangement or cultural institution can do — he regenerates the heart, reorders the desires, and creates a community held together not by factional interest but by the love of God poured out through his Spirit.


Why Christians Should Read Thucydides — and What They Must Do with What They Find

You are living in a moment when the patterns Thucydides identified in Corcyra are visible in the society around you with painful clarity. Language is being reassigned. Moral categories are inverting. Factional loyalty is displacing family bonds, civic trust, and the fear of God in millions of hearts. Read Thucydides and let his unflinching account of human nature under pressure deepen your confidence that the Bible is telling the truth about the human heart. Read the prophets and let their diagnoses of societal collapse drive you to intercession for your neighbors, your nation, and your church. Read Paul and let his account of the gospel’s power convince you that the stasis tearing the world apart does not have the final word. And then live as what you are: members of the one community on earth whose foundation is the eternal Word who will not allow his language to be corrupted, and who is making all things new. Where Thucydides ends in cyclical pessimism, the gospel begins with resurrection.


Listen to the episode on Spotify



This blog and podcast were created with assistance from AI.

Monday, June 18, 2007

History of the English Language

History of the English Language


OLD ENGLISH

Every letter was pronounced and words were spelled as they were pronounced. Each dialect had its own spelling.

Old English had European vowel sounds: Ah, Eh, Ee, Oh, Oo.

Old English vocabulary was deeply influenced by Norse (Scandinavian words). Some Norse words survived along with their English counterparts. For example:

Ship [OE] = Skip [N] (today: a skipper pilots a ship)
Shirt [OE]= Skirt [N] (today: both are a piece of clothing)
Church [OE]= Kirk [N] (today: both are a place of worship in Scotland)

Old English was fully inflected and had case endings, verb tense endings, and gender forms much like German has today. Some of this is fossilized in the King James Bible:

For example: dost, doth, etc. (inflections of the verb “to do”).

Old English also had both 2nd person singular and plural pronouns: Thou and You. Using the second person plural “you” was the polite way to address a single person, while the singular form “thou” was the informal way to address someone. The King James Bible fossilized the use of “Thou” and “Thee” and “Thine” in reference to God since the informal form of address was always used for God in all European languages. Thus, what sounds very formal to us today was actually the informal and intimate way to address someone. By the seventeenth century the second person singular pronoun (thou, etc.) had dropped out and the second person plural pronoun (you) did double duty.

Old English verbs were strong verbs (the vowel changed to indicate tense): sing, sang, sung. However, all new verbs are weak verbs (add “–ed” and “have” to indicate tense): walk, walked, have walked. All new verbs being coined today (since the fifteenth century) are weak verbs.


MIDDLE ENGLISH

The Norman Conquest of 1066 dramatically changed the English language. The northern French dialect of the Norman rulers affected the development of the English language for 300 years.

The was a massive influx of French words into the English vocabulary. As with the Norse words, many of the English words survived along with the French words. For example:

Chalet = Castle
Chapeau = Cap
Chattle = Cattle
Guardian = Warden
Guarantee = Warranty
Gauge = Wage
Salon = Saloon

French also had a strong influence on English vocabulary for food. In Old English, the same word used for animal was also used for the name of the dish. After the eleventh century, however, French words were used for the dishes and not the English animal words. For example:

Pig = Pork
Cow = Beef
Calf = Veal
Lamb = Mutton

There were many dialects in England, and some of them were mutually unintelligible. A man from the south traveling in the north might be mistaken for a foreigner and find that communication was impossible.

The government also began to standardized spelling. Spelling was determined by the ruling dialect, so that words were no longer spelled as they were pronounced but by the standard set by the government. With the introduction of the printing press to England, standardized spelling became universal and unchanging.

As prepositions became more popular, they began to supercede the use of case endings. By the end of the Middle English period, the case endings had all but disappeared.

There was also an increase in the use of the continuous aspect of the verb, using the –ing verb endings.

By this time, England had become a trilingual society: English, French, and Latin. English was spoken by the common man, French by the court, and Latin by the clergy. Most scholarly works were in Latin, and most English works were translated into Latin. One artifact of this reality can still be seen in the wedding vows still used by some: “to love, honor and cherish.” Love is an Old English word, honor comes from French, and cherish is Latin. All three words mean basically the same thing, indicating that the vows grew out of this trilingual culture.


MODERN ENGLISH

The most dramatic change to the English Language came in the Great Vowel Shift (15th century). English pronunciation shifted from its European roots (Ah Eh Ee Oh Oo), to its present pronunciation of Ay Ee Ai Ohh You. Even Shakespeare had a very difficult time understanding Middle English works, such as Chaucer.

Shakespeare, along with his contemporaries, began to coin many new words. Shakespeare’s vocabulary is so extensive because many of the words he used were springing into existence as he wrote.

One dramatic change during this time was the propensity to turn nouns into verbs, for example: hound = to hound.

There was also an influx of new scientific words that later took on metaphorical meanings, for example: Attraction, which originally referred to the force that caused to bodies to move closer to each other, and later took on the metaphorical use.

There was also the introduction of the nominalization of verbs using the “–ing” ending.

Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language (1755) and Noah Webster’s Dictionary (1828) in America started the modern trend of lexicography of the English language.


PIDGIN ENGLISH AND CREOLE

Pidgin is a makeshift language used by two or more groups of people that do not share a common language, in such situations as trade or slavery. Creole is a fully developed language that evolved out of a Pidgin.