Thursday, December 19, 2013

IV.       Analysis of Revelation 13:11-18

A.        The Beast from the Sea

            Καὶ εἶδον ἄλλο θηρίον (13:11a)

1.         Textual and Exegetical Issues

a.         Καὶ εἶδον introduces the third vision in the sequence of seven visions and continues the narrative of the third woe (9:12; 11:14; 12:12 οὐαὶ τὴν γῆν καὶ τὴν θάλασσαν, ὅτι κατέβη ὁ διάβολος πρὸς ὑμᾶς ἔχων θυμὸν μέγαν, εἰδὼς ὅτι ὀλίγον καιρὸν ἔχει).

b.         ὁράω is used 62 times (45 are εἶδον) in Revelation (θεάομαι not used; βλέπω used 12 times), showing the visionary nature of the book. Lee (144-145) points out that many occurrences of εἶδον are followed by narrative asides that explain what the seer saw. The vision of the second beast is followed by the narrative asides in verse 18.

c.         Rev 12:18-13:18 is a single unit. This scene parodies the scene in Rev 5 where the Lamb takes the scroll in preparation of opening the seven seals (See Aune, 726).

1)         Just as the Lamb receives power and authority (5:12), the beast receives power and authority from the dragon (13:2)

2)         Just as the Lamb rules over all tribes, languages, and nations purchased with his blood (5:9), the beast rules over all tribes, languages, and nations (13:7).

3)         Just as the living creatures fall down and worship the Lamb (5:12), those who dwell on the earth worship the beast, saying “Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?”  (13:4).

4)         Just as the Lamb has been slaughtered and come back to life (5:6), the beast has been mortally wounded but come back to life (13:3). It is also described in a way that parodies God’s title: “once was, now is not, and yet will come up out of the Abyss and go to its destruction” (17:8).

d.         ἄλλο θηρίον points back to the first beast from the sea.

1)         ἄλλος is used several times to begin a new scene (7:2; 8:3; 10:1; 18:1; 20:1). (Aune, 755)

2)         θηρίον is used 31 times in Revelation (used only 7 times in the rest of NT). (Rev 6:8; 11:7; 13:1–4, 11–12, 14–15, 17–18; 14:9, 11; 15:2; 16:2, 10, 13; 17:3, 7–8, 11–13, 16–17; 18:2; 19:19–20; 20:4, 10).

3)         He comes up out of the sea (ἐκ τῆς θαλάσσης θηρίον ἀναβαῖνον; Rev 13:1) or from the Abyss (ἄβυσσος; Rev 11:7; 17:8): chaos, nations, sheol, haunt of demons.

4)         His power is derived from the Dragon (Rev 12:2-4).

5)         He has ten crowns on his ten horns, representing ten kings who have been given power to rule by the beast (Rev 13:1; 17:3, 7, 12, 16, 17).

6)         He had blasphemous names written on his heads (Rev 13:1).

7)         He utters haughty and blasphemous words (Rev 13:5-6).

8)         He is allowed to exercise authority for 42 months (Rev 13:5; cf. 11:2-3; 12:6, 14).

9)         He claims divine honors and is worshipped (Rev 13:8, 12; 14:9).

10)       He received a mortal wound which was healed (Rev 13:3, 12).

11)       He will attack God’s people (Rev 13:7; 16:13; 19:19; cf. 11:2, 7).

12)       He will be thrown into the Lake of Fire (15:2; 19:20; 20:10).

e.         There are parallels between 13:1-10 and 13:11-18 (see Appendix II)

1)         Both begin with seeing (Καὶ εἶδον)

2)         Both come up out of something (ἐκ τῆς _____ θηρίον ἀναβαῖνον)

3)         Both have horns (ἔχον κέρατα _____)

4)         Both receive authority from someone greater (ἐξουσίαν)

5)         Both are likened to something else (ὅμοια ____, ὡς ____)

6)         Both are empowered by someone else (ἐδόθη αὐτῷ)

7)         Both describe the healing of the first beast’s wound (πληγὴ)

8)         Both describe the speaking of the first beast or his image (λαλοῦν / λαλήσῃ)

9)         Both call for the reader to consider something important (Ὧδέ ἐστιν _____)

f.          The sea beast is a parody of God and Christ in chapter 17.

1)         The three-fold title of the beast

ἦν καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν καὶ μέλλει ἀναβαίνειν (17:8a)

ἦν καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν καὶ παρέσται (17:8b)

ἦν καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν καὶ εἰς ἀπώλειαν ὑπάγει (17:11)

2)         The three-fold title of God

ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος (1:4)

ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος (1:8)

ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος (4:8)

ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν (11:17)

ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν (16:5)

3)         This is a parody of the Parousia of Christ (ὁ ἐρχόμενος most likely refers to Christ’s second coming while chapter 13 is a parody of the resurrection of Christ), where the beast disappears (οὐκ ἔστιν) but then returns only to go to destruction (εἰς ἀπώλειαν ὑπάγει).

2.         Literary Background

a.         The sea represents the forces of chaos aligned against God

1)         Leviathan (לִוְיָתָן), the sea monster, is defeated by the Lord (Isa 27:1; Psa 74:14; 104:26; Job 3:8; 40:25).

           Let those curse it who curse the day, who are ready to rouse up Leviathan. (Job 3:8)

           “Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook or press down his tongue with a cord? (Job 41:1)

           You crushed the heads of Leviathan; you gave him as food for the creatures of the wilderness. (Psa 74:14)

           There go the ships, and Leviathan, which you formed to play in it. (Psa 104:26)

           In that day the LORD with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea. (Isa 27:1)

           for all that you smote Leviathan the fleeing serpent, made an end of the twisted serpent, the tyrant with seven heads. (CTA 1.5 col I lines 1-3)

2)         “This beast from the sea is, at least in part, an allusion to the Jewish tradition of Leviathan, a female monster who was separated from Behemoth on the fifth day of creation and assigned to the sea (1 Enoch 60:7–11, 24; 4 Ezra 6:47–52; 2ApocBar 29:4; b. B. Bat. 74b–75a).” (Aune, 732)

           On that day, two monsters will be parted –one monster, a female name Leviathan, in order to dwell in the abyss of the ocean over the fountains of water; and (the other), a male called Behemoth, which holds his chest in an invisible desert whose name is Dundayin, east of the garden of Eden, wherein the elect and the righteous ones well, wherein my grandfather was taken, the seventh from Adam, the first man who the Lord of the Spirits created. Then I asked the second angel in order that he may show me (how) strong these monsters are, how they were separated on this day and would cast, the one into the abysses of the ocean, and the other into the dry desert. And he said to me, “You, Son of Man, according (to the degree) to which it will be permitted, you will know the hidden things.” And the angel of peace who was with me said to me, “These two monsters are prepared for the great day of the Lord (when) they shall turn into food.” (1Enoch 60:7-11, 24)

           Upon the fifth day thou didst bid the seventh part, where the water was gathered together, to bring forth living creatures, birds, and fishes; and so it came to pass. 48 The dumb and lifeless water produced living creatures that for this the nations might declare thy wonderous works. 49 Then didst thou preserve two living creatures; the name of the one thou didst call Behemoth and the name of the other thou didst call Leviathan. 50 And thou didst separate the one from the other; for the seventh part, where the water was gathered together, was unable to hold them (both). 51 And thou didst give Behemoth one of the parts which had been dried up on the third day to dwell in, (that namely) where are a thousand hills: 52 but unto Leviathan thou gavest the seventh part, namely the moist: and thou hast reserved them to be devoured by whom thou wilt and when. (4Ezra 6:47-52)

           And Behemoth shall be revealed from his place and Leviathan shall ascend from the sea, those two great monsters which I created on the fifth day of creation, and shall have kept until that time; and then they shall be for food for all that are left. (2Bar. 29:4)

3)         The sea monster is often used to symbolize an oppressive foreign power, like Egypt (Ps 74:14; 87:4; Isa 30:7; Ezek 29:3; 32:2–3), Nebuchadnezzar (Jer 51:34), and Pompey (δράκων, PssSol 2:25). (Aune, 732-733)

           It was you who crushed the heads of Leviathan and gave it as food to the creatures of the desert. (Psa 74:14)

           “I will record Rahab and Babylon among those who acknowledge me— Philistia too, and Tyre, along with Cush — and will say, ‘This one was born in Zion.’ ” (Psa 87:4)

           to Egypt, whose help is utterly useless. Therefore I call her Rahab the Do-nothing. (Isa 30:7)

           Speak to him and say: ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: “ ‘I am against you, Pharaoh king of Egypt, you great monster lying among your streams. You say, “The Nile belongs to me; I made it for myself.” (Ezek 29:3)

           “Son of man, take up a lament concerning Pharaoh king of Egypt and say to him:  “ ‘You are like a lion among the nations; you are like a monster in the seas thrashing about in your streams, churning the water with your feet and muddying the streams. (Ezek 32:2)

          “ ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: “ ‘With a great throng of people I will cast my net over you, and they will haul you up in my net. (Ezek 32:3)

           “Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon has devoured us, he has thrown us into confusion, he has made us an empty jar. Like a serpent he has swallowed us and filled his stomach with our delicacies, and then has spewed us out. (Jer 51:34)

b.         This beast is a composite of Daniel’s four beasts (Dan 7)

1 In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream, and visions passed through his mind as he was lying in bed. He wrote down the substance of his dream. 2  Daniel said: “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me were the four winds of heaven churning up the great sea.  3 Four great beasts, each different from the others, came up out of the sea.  4  “The first was like a lion, and it had the wings of an eagle. I watched until its wings were torn off and it was lifted from the ground so that it stood on two feet like a human being, and the mind of a human was given to it.  5  “And there before me was a second beast, which looked like a bear. It was raised up on one of its sides, and it had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth. It was told, ‘Get up and eat your fill of flesh!’ 6  “After that, I looked, and there before me was another beast, one that looked like a leopard. And on its back it had four wings like those of a bird. This beast had four heads, and it was given authority to rule.  7  “After that, in my vision at night I looked, and there before me was a fourth beast—terrifying and frightening and very powerful. It had large iron teeth; it crushed and devoured its victims and trampled underfoot whatever was left. It was different from all the former beasts, and it had ten horns. 8  “While I was thinking about the horns, there before me was another horn, a little one, which came up among them; and three of the first horns were uprooted before it. This horn had eyes like the eyes of a human being and a mouth that spoke boastfully.

1)         It borrows elements from each of Daniel’s four beasts (Rev 13:2). (Osborne, 511)

2)         The four beasts of Daniel come up out of the sea (Dan 7:2-3).

3)         The ten horns are borrowed from the fourth beast (Dan 7:7, 20, 24).

           “After that, in my vision at night I looked, and there before me was a fourth beast—terrifying and frightening and very powerful. It had large iron teeth; it crushed and devoured its victims and trampled underfoot whatever was left. It was different from all the former beasts, and it had ten horns. (Dan 7:7)

           I also wanted to know about the ten horns on its head and about the other horn that came up, before which three of them fell—the horn that looked more imposing than the others and that had eyes and a mouth that spoke boastfully. (Dan 7:20)

           The ten horns are ten kings who will come from this kingdom. After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three kings. (Dan 7:24)

4)         According to Beale and Carson (1127), Leviathan was said to have seven heads (CTA 5.I.1–3; 3.III.37–39; cf. also Job 40–41; Ps. 74:13–14; 89:10; Isa. 27:1; 51:9; see also Odes Sol. 22:5).

5)         The blasphemous names of the beast are related to the little horn who spoke boastfully in Daniel 7:8, 11. (Beale and Carson, 1127)

           While I was thinking about the horns, there before me was another horn, a little one, which came up among them; and three of the first horns were uprooted before it. This horn had eyes like the eyes of a human being and a mouth that spoke boastfully. (Dan 7:8)

           Then I continued to watch because of the boastful words the horn was speaking. I kept looking until the beast was slain and its body destroyed and thrown into the blazing fire. (Dan 7:11)

c.         According to Beale and Carson (1127), STJ identified Daniel’s fourth beast with Rome (Midr. Rab. Gen. 44:17; 76:6; Midr. Rab. Exod. 15:6; 25:8; cf. Matt. 24:15 with Luke 21:20; see also 4 Ezra 12:10; 2 Bar. 39:5–8; As. Mos. 10:8; cf. Josephus, Ant. 10.203–210 with Ant. 10.272–278; Pss. Sol. 2:25 where a Roman ruler is called “the dragon”).

3.         Historical and Cultural Background

a.         His seven heads reflect the seven hills of Rome (Rev 17:3, 7, 9, 12) and its emperors.

b.         Rome came from the sea from the viewpoint of Asia Minor (Keener; Beale and Carson, 1127).

c.         An eagle with 12 wings and three heads, representing Rome, came from the sea (4 Ezra 11:1).

d.         Cetus (Tiamatu): Constellation rising over the sea in the southern sky that depicts a combination of beasts before the flood (Malina, 170-174).

4.         Interpretive Options (see Appendix IV)

a.         Preterit

1)         Leviathan as symbolic of the Roman Empire as the composite of the four beasts of Daniel 7.

2)         Nero or Nero Redivivus.

3)         Domitian.

b.         Idealist

1)         Leviathan as symbolic of all Satanic opposition to God.

2)         Rome as a symbol of world governments opposed to the Church.

c.         Futurist

1)         Confederation of 10 nations headed by the revived Roman Empire.

2)         The Antichrist.





III.       Four Strands of the Antichrist Tradition

A.        Chaos Myth

1.         The mythic conflict between the forces of chaos and order.

2.         The OT picks up on the Babylonian Chaos Myth as seen in the many references to God prevailing over primeval forces that threaten creation, such as the dragon, the sea, the deep, chaos, formlessness and void, sea monsters, Rahab, Leviathan, Behemoth, and the Serpent (Gen 1:1-2; 3:1-15; Ps 74:3-8; 89:11 (10); 104:6-9; Job 3:8; 7:12; 26:12; 40:25-41:26; Isa 27:1; 30:7; 51:9; Ezek 29:3; 38:1-3; Hab 3:8, 15; Amos 9:3).

3.         Several STJ passages pick up on this (2 Bar 14; 29).

4.         So does the book of Revelation (Rev 12:1-17; 13:1-11; 16:13; 20:2).

B.        Cosmic Battle

1.         There is a Cosmic Battle between God and Satan, the leader of the spiritual forces of evil.

2.         The OT speaks of a cosmic battle between God and Satan, Gog and Magog, and the Prince of the Persia (Job 1:6; Ezek. 38:1-3; 39:1, 6; Dan. 10:13; Zech. 3:1).

3.         Many STJ passages pick up and develop this cosmic battle, identifying the leader of the forces of evil as Satan, the devil, demons, Beliar/Belial, Azazel, Melchiresha, the Spirit of Error, the Spirit of Deceit and of Beliar, the Watchers, the Angel of Darkness, the Ruler of Error, the Angel of Malevolence, the Angels of destruction, and the Prince of the Realm of Wickedness (Isaiah_A 1:9; Lives 4:7; 17:2; Moses 8; 10:7; T. Dan 5:6-11; 7:3; T. Levi 3:3; 18:12; T. Simeon 2:7; T. Judah 19:4; 20:1-2; 25:3; Sibyl 2:167-169; 3:63-74; 1 Enoch 6-16; 90:13-16; Jubil 1:20; PsSol 17:23-27; Wis 2:24; CD 4:12-19; 5:17-19; 8:1-2; 12:2-3; 19:13-14; 1QS 1:16-24; 2:4-10; 2:19; 3:17-21; 4:18-19; 9:11; 1QM 1:1-2; 1:1-15; 4:1-2; 11:7-8; 13:1-12; 14:8-10; 18:1-3; 11QMelch 2:12-13).

4.         The NT also speaks of Satan, the devil, Belial, the evil one, the spirit of error, the spirit that is at work in the sons of disobedience, the mystery of lawlessness, deceitful spirits, the spirit of Antichrist, unclean spirits, and the rulers, authorities, cosmic powers, and spiritual forces of evil (Eph 2:2; 6:12; 2 Cor 6:15; 2 Thess 2; 1 Tim 4:1-2; 1 John 4:1-6; Jude 8-19).

5.         Revelation picks up this theme (Rev 2:9, 10, 13, 24; 3:9; 12:9; 20:2, 7, 10).

C.        End Time Tyrant

1.         A human political or military figure opposes God and oppresses his people.

2.         This includes such OT figures as Pharaoh, Assyria, Babylon, Antiochus IV Epiphanies, the abomination that causes desolation, the little horn, the bold-faced king, all nations, Cain, and Korah (Ps 2; 74:3-8; Ezek 38:1-3; 39:1, 6; Dan 8:13; 8:22-25; 9:27; 11:31; 12:11; Zech 14).

3.         Most of the STJ passages that speak of a tyrant that oppresses God’s people refer to a historical figure, such as Antiochus IV Epiphanies, Pompey, Caligula, Nero, Titus or Nero Redivivus (Sibyl 4:119-139; 5:28-34; 5:93-110; 5:361-370; 1 Enoch 37-71; 90:13-16; Mart of Isa; 1 Macc 1:54; 2 Macc 9:12; 2 Esdras 13:5).

4.         The DSS refer mainly to the final apocalyptic battle with the Kittim, the Romans (1QM 1:1-15; 4:1-2; 11:7-8; 13:1-12; 11QMelch 2:12-13).

5.         The NT speaks of this figure as the Abomination that Causes Desolation, the Man of Lawlessness, Gog and Magog, and Korah (Matt 24; Mark 13; Luke 22; 2 Thess 2).

6.         Revelation applies this theme to the beast from the sea (Rev 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20).

D.        False Prophet

1.         The False Prophet deceives the nations or the people of God, leads them astray to follow after the Antichrist or foreign gods, and entices them to turn from God and his Law to practice evil.

2.         The OT speaks of false prophets who deceive Israel (Gen 3:1-5; Deut 13: 1-7; 18:9-22; Num 22-24; 31; 1 Kings 22:21-23; Dan 8:22-25).

3.         The False Prophet is picked up in STJ either through historical figures who deceived Israel, such as Jason and Menelaus, the Man of Mockery, the Sprayer of Lies, the Wicked Priest, the Man of the Lie, and Yannes and Yambres (Josephus, Antiquities 2:293-349; CD 1:14-2:1; 1QpHab 1:12-13; 1QpHab 2:1-10; 1QpHab 10:9-13; 1Q14 f8_ 10:4-5), or through evil spirits who lead men astray (T. Levi 3:3; T. Simeon 2:7; T. Judah 19:4; 20:1-2; 25:3; Sibyl 2:167-169; 3:63-74; 5:28-34; CD 4:12-19).

4.         The NT speaks of such figures as false prophets, false Christs, the Antichrist, Antichrists, deceivers, the Man of Lawlessness, doctrines of demons, false teachers, and Balaam (Matt 24; Mark 13; Luke 22; 2 Thess 2; 1 Tim 4:1-2; 1 John 2:18-27; 4:1-6; 2 John 7; 2 Peter 2:1-3; Jude 8-19).

5.         Revelation applies this theme to the beast from the land, the false prophet (Rev 13, 16, 19, 20).





II.        History of Research on the Antichrist

A.        Hermann Gunkel, Creation and Chaos, 1895

1.         The Antichrist is the Dragon of the Babylonian Myth, where Marduk is a type of Christ and Tiamat is a type of the Antichrist.

2.         He used a History of Religions approach in his study of Genesis 1 and Revelation 12 to argue that book of Revelation is based on the cyclical death-rebirth theme of the Enuma Elish.

3.         He did not use STJ.

B.        Wilhelm Boussett, The Antichrist Legend, 1896

1.         The Antichrist is a personification of the Babylonian Dragon Myth as the culmination of a long process where the Myth was adopted and adapted by each successive generation.

2.         He used the Pseudepigrapha (the Dead Sea Scrolls had not yet been discovered) to show that the apolitical Dragon Myth, where the sea monster becomes Satan and the Antichrist his personification, was used by Revelation as a polemic against Rome.

3.         A single figure was created out of two separate traditions, one of a end-time tyrant and the other an end-time deceiver.

C.        Moriz Friedlander, “L’ Anti-Messie,” REJ, 1899

1.         He used a History of Religions approach in his study of the antinomian sect the Minim to show that the Antichrist is the personification of apostasy, the culmination of all supernatural beings of who oppose God.

2.         He has been largely ignored.

D.        R. H. Charles, Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Revelation, 1920

1.         The Antichrist is a God-opposing human being modeled on Antiochus IV in Daniel.

2.         Though he was not originally a superhuman nor is he Jewish, but possibly Nero Redividus, Paul turned him into a superhuman opponent of God.

3.         He found three traditions in the STJ literature (200 BC to AD 100): Beliar, Nero, and Antichrist (a fusion of the traditions after AD 88).

4.         He feels that Paul merged the False Prophet theme with Beliar to create the Man of Lawlessness.

5.         He popularized Boussett’s view and most scholars have adopted the Bouseet-Charles thesis and methodology.

E.         Beda Rigaux, Saint-Paul: Les epitres aux Thessaloniciens, 1956

1.         The Antichrist is a collective concept, so Antiochus IV is not a detailed type of the Antichrist but only one strand of the tradition.

2.         Starting with the OT and working through STJ, he sees a connection between Messiah and anti-Messiah culminating in the NT where all the strands are combined into one individual.

F.         W. A. Meekes, The prophet-King: Moses Traditions and the Johannine Christology, 1967

1.         He pointed to the False Prophet tradition, whose common elements, deception, leading astray the elect by signs and wonders, and Jewish origin, are most often associated with the Antichrist in the literature.

2.         He has largely been ignored.

G.        J. Ernst, Die eschatologischen Gegenspieler in den Schriften des Neuen Testaments, 1967

1.         Based on a limited study of STJ, though leaving out the DSS, he concludes that the Antichrist is only one of several end-time opponents, each having a rich tradition that sometimes overlap.

2.         The NT does not have a single concept of an end-time opponent but utilizes all of these traditions, sometimes juxtaposing them.

H.        Adela Yarbro Collins, The Combat Myth in the Book of Revelation, 1967

1.         She developed the Babylonian Combat Myth and showed how it permeates the book of Revelation.

2.         She finds the Antichrist only in contexts where the term Antichrist is used or there is a clear opponent to a Messianic figure.

I.          D. Flusser (writings between 1972-1992)

1.         He used STJ, including the DSS.

2.         He concludes that the Antichrist is the human manifestation of satanic powers who can be identified with Melkiresha (4Q280; 4Q544) and the son of the Most High (4Q246).

J.         Hans Burgmann (writings between 1974-1992)

1.         He used STJ, including the DSS.

2.         He concluded that the historical human figure, called by various names, who is the enemy of the DSS community, becomes the archetype of the eschatological Antichrist, a human being controlled by the evil one.

K.        William C. Weinrich, “Antichrist in the Early Church,” Concordia Theological Review, 1985

1.         Basing his research on the False Prophet motif and Israel as God’s chosen people, he concludes that since both beasts in Revelation parody Jesus, they can both be called Antichrist.

2.         He points out that the prefix anti- may mean “in place of” and not “against.” The early church used the term Antichrist as a weapon against heretics and not the Roman Empire or the Jews.

L.         Gregory C. Jenks, The Origin and Development of the Antichrist Myth, 1991

1.         The Antichrist is the “Endtyrant” who opposes Christ and his people, deceives many, using signs and wonders, teaches false doctrine, unleashed evil on the world, is proud and arrogant, claims divine honors, conquers vast territory and persecutes the people of God, but is destroyed in the end by Christ.

2.         Rejecting oral tradition, he accepts only elements which occur in a Messianic context where there is clear opposition to the Messiah.

3.         Based on his study of STJ, including the DSS, he concludes that there is no concept of an “Endtyrant” in STJ, especially in the DSS.

4.         The many strands of tradition are brought together as the Antichrist only in the NT and developed in Christian theology while later Jewish literature do not have an Antichrist but merge the Beliar and Nero Redividus traditions in a way that is distinct from Christianity.

M.       Bernard McGinn, Antichrist: Two Thousand Years of the Human Fascination with Evil, 1994

1.         He sees two sets of polarities in the literature: External-Internal and Dread-Deception.

2.         He delineates four separate traditions: Chaos Conflict, Satan, End-tyrant, and False Prophet.

O.        L. J. Lietaert Peerbolte, The Antecedents of Antichrist, 1996

1.         He used STJ, including the DSS

2.         He concludes that the elements of the AD third century Antichrist never occur together in STJ and none of them occur everywhere, therefore Antichrist is a Christian invention.

P.         G. W. Lorein, The Antichrist Theme in the Intertestamental Period, 2003

1.         Frustrated with the narrow criteria of Jenks and Peerbolte, he denies that texts have to have opposition to the Messiah or contain the word ἀντίχριστος to refer to the Antichrist.

2.         The concept of Antichrist is derived from the OT, occurs in its fullness in STJ, and is linked to the concept of Messiah across all types of literature, though it is more prevalent in apocalyptic.

Q.        Stephen J. Viccio, The Legend of the Anti-Christ: A History, 2009

1.         He uses STJ, including the DSS, and the methodology of Gunkel and Boussett, adding the study of Caananite myths and the Persian conflict between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainya.

2.         He concludes that the Antichrist is the manifestation of Marduk or Angra Mainya with additional concepts added to the myth based on Caligula and Nero.




History of Interpretation of Revelation 13:11-18

I.          History of Interpretation (see Appendix I)

A.        Early Church Fathers (See Weinrich; Aune, 753)

1.         Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 5.28.1-2; 5.29.30; 5.30.4. [2nd century]

a.         The number of the beast points to either Evanthas (EUANQAS) or Lateinos (LATEINOS), the Latins or Romans, the fourth beast of Daniel, or τειταν.

b.         The second beast is the “armour-bearer” of the first beast, the false prophet.

c.         He performs signs by magic not divine power.

2.         Hippolytus, On the Antichrist, 49. [3rd century]

a.         The beast from the earth is the Antichrist, and the two horns are the False Prophet.

b.         Like a lamb means he makes himself like the Son of God.

c.         Like a dragon points to his deception.

3.         Victorinus of Petrovium, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 13.4-18. [3rd to 4th century]

a.         The first beast is the kingdom of the Antichrist.

b.         The beast from the land is the false prophet.

c.         He sets up a golden image in the Jerusalem temple and an apostate angel enters it and utters oracles through it.

d.         His number is the name of a man: τειταν (Sol or Phoebus), DICLUX (cut off from light yet makes himself appear as an angel of light), αντεμος, or γενσηρικος.

4.         Tyconius, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 13.11. [4th century]

a.         The two horns are the two testaments that belong to the true lamb.

b.         He pretends to be the Lamb in order to attack the Lamb, the body of Christ.

5.         Oecumenuius, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 13.11-13. [6th century]

a.         The earth is the source of all humankind for the Antichrist is a man.

b.         He pretends to be a lamb and a dragon, but he is neither Christ nor the Devil.

6.         Andrew of Caesarea, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 13.11-18. [6th century]

a.         The dragon is the devil, the beast from the sea is the Antichrist, and the beast from the land is the false prophet.

b.         Coming from the land indicates his groveling manner of life.

c.         He uses sorcery to make mankind believe the first beast is God.

d.         The mark on the right hand brings an end to good works, and the mark on the forehead makes them bold in their deception and darkness.

7.         Primasius, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 13.16. [6th century]

a.         The hand indicates works, the right hand signifies the truth.

b.         The forehead symbolizes the confession of faith.

c.         Since they are defrauded of both they are said to be marked on both.

B.        Middle Ages to Reformation

1.         Middle Ages

a.         St. Anselm: “Towards the end of the world Antichrist will draw the hearts of the Jews to him by his great generosity and sympathetic attitude so much so that they will praise him as a demi-god;... For, the Temple which Solomon built having been destroyed, in its place he shall restore it, he shall circumcise himself, and he shall give forth the lie that he is the son of the omnipotent God…. Antichrist will rule the world from Jerusalem, which he will make into a magnificent city.” (Details Concerning the Antichrist)

b.         Thomas Aquinas: “As in Christ dwells the fullness of the Godhead so in Antichrist the fullness of all wickedness. Not indeed in the sense that his humanity
is to be assumed by the devil into unity of person..., but that the devil by suggestion infuses his wickedness more copiously into him than
into all others.” (Summa III.8.8)

2.         Reformation

a.         Martin Luther: “This teaching shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist, who has exalted himself above, and opposed himself against Christ, because he will not permit Christians to be saved without his power, which, nevertheless, is nothing, and is neither ordained nor commanded by God. This is, properly speaking, to exalt himself above all that is called God…. The Pope, however, prohibits this faith, saying that to be saved a person must obey him.” (Smalcald Articles, II, IV, 10-12)

b.         John Calvin: “We regard the Roman Pontiff as the leader and standard-bearer of that wicked and abominable kingdom.” (Institutes, 4.2.12)







Thursday, July 19, 2012

Religion of Consumption

What has taken the place of religious commitment is the "economy" in the form of an even greater consumption of the goods that science in the service of technology and industry delivers. Combined with an ever more malleable and mercurial "self" defined in terms of the fufillment of material desires, the urge for infinite acquisition has become the default religion even of believers. This "religion" prevails even though in acting it out Christians violate their own religion's claims that self-love and covetousness are close to the essence of sin. The religion is that of Cole Porter's "Anything Goes," or, more recently, "Whatever."
Dale Van Kley, professor of history at Ohio State University

The Long-range Point of View

The long-range point of view is the best solution to the immediate problem.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Worry

"The art of life is to deal with problems as they arise, rather than destroy one's spirit by worrying about them too far in advance." Cicero

Sovereignty of Christ

"No single piece of our mental world is to be hermetically sealed off from the rest, and there is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: 'Mine!'"
Abraham Kuyper

Thursday, April 5, 2012

America's Real Religion

What has taken the place of religious commitment is the "economy" in the form of an even greater consumption of the goods that science in the service of technology and industry delivers. Combined with an ever more malleable and mercurial "self" defined in terms of the fufillment of material desires, the urge for infinite acquisition has become the default religion even of believers. This "religion" prevails even though in acting it out Christians violate their own religion's claims that self-love and covetousness are close to the essence of sin. The religion is that of Cole Porter's "Anything Goes," or, more recently, "Whatever."
Dale Van Kley, professor of history at Ohio State University