Thursday, December 19, 2013

IV.       Analysis of Revelation 13:11-18

H.        The Mark of the Beast

            καὶ ποιεῖ πάντας, τοὺς μικροὺς καὶ τοὺς μεγάλους, καὶ τοὺς πλουσίους καὶ τοὺς πτωχούς, καὶ τοὺς ἐλευθέρους καὶ τοὺς δούλους, ἵνα δῶσιν αὐτοῖς χάραγμα ἐπὶ τῆς χειρὸς αὐτῶν τῆς δεξιᾶς ἢ ἐπὶ τὸ μέτωπον αὐτῶν καὶ ἵνα μή τις δύνηται ἀγοράσαι ἢ πωλῆσαι εἰ μὴ ὁ ἔχων τὸ χάραγμα τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ θηρίου ἢ τὸν ἀριθμὸν τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ. (13:16-17)

1.         Textual and Exegetical Issues

a.         καί {A}

            “The absence of καί in * C about 25 minuscules (including 1611) syrph, h copsa, bo al appears to be a secondary modification arising from misunderstanding the relationship between verses 16 and 17. When the ἵνα μή clause was taken to be dependent upon δῶσιν, καί was naturally regarded as superfluous, whereas the clause is no doubt to be taken as dependent upon ποιεῖ and therefore coordinate with the ἵνα δῶσιν clause. The text is supported by P47 c Avid P 046 051 1006 1854 2344 itgig, ar vg arm eth al.” (Metzger, 676)

b.         The second beast makes everyone receive the mark of the first beast.

1)         The verb ποιεῖ governs six genitives, three sets of pairs; each pair is a merismus: every social category = all of humanity: small and great (11:18; 13:16; 19:5, 18; 20:12); rich and poor (13:16); free and slave (6:15; 13:16; 19:18).

6:15
11:18
13:16
19:5
19:18
20:12
Small & Great

Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Rich & Poor


Negative



Free & Slave
Negative

Negative

Negative

2)         χάραγμα is used 7 times in Rev, all for the mark of the beast (13:16–17; 14:9, 11; 16:2; 19:20; 20:4). Not used in LXX or PSEUD.

           Only other use in NT is in Acts 17:29 of the statues of the gods in Athens.

           1. a mark that is engraved, etched, branded, cut, imprinted, mark, stamp. 2. an object fashioned by artistic skill involving alteration of a medium, thing formed, image (BDAG).

           There is debate whether it is visible (literal) or inner (symbolic).

           The “mark” of the beast is identified with the “name” of the beast which is the “number of his name.”

3)         On the right hand (ἐπὶ τῆς χειρὸς αὐτῶν τῆς δεξιᾶς).

4)         On the forehead (ἐπὶ τὸ μέτωπον αὐτῶν).

           μέτωπον: forehead Lk 23:48 Of a young woman: veiled. As the place marked w. a sign of some kind; of a branded slave; Rv 7:3; 9:4; 13:16; 14:1, 9; 17:5; 20:4; 22:4 (BDAG)

           Used 8 times in Revelation

7:3                   Seal God’s servants on the forehead.

9:4                   Those without the seal of God on their forehead.

13:16   mark of the beast on the forehead.

14:1     The Father’s name written on the forehead.

14:9     image of the beast on the forehead.

17:5     Babylon written on her forehead.

20:4     did not have the mark of the beast on their forehead.

22:4     Name of the Lamb (or God) on their foreheads.

5)         The sea beast has blasphemous names on its heads (13:1; cf. 17:3).

6)         This is a parody of God’s seal on the forehead of believers (Rev 7:3; 9:4; [Father’s name]: 14:1; 22:4).

a.         The next verse contrasts the mark of the beast with the seal of God (14:1).

b.         Seal of Christ or Mark of the Beast: no neutrality. (Osborne, 518)

c.         Those with the mark of the Beast will be judged by God:

           Will drink God’s wrath and be tormented with fire and sulfur (Rev 14:9-11).

           Will be inflicted with boils as the first bowl is poured out (Rev 16:2).

           Will be thrown alive into the Lake of Fire (Rev 19:20).

2.         Literary Background

a.         “And the LORD said to him, ‘Pass through the city, through Jerusalem, and put a mark on the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations that are committed in it.’” (Ezek 9:4)

b.         Ptolemy Philopater I (217 BC) branded Jews with ivy leaf of Dionysus to show they had turned from previous allegiances and were fully loyal to him (3 Macc 2:28-29).

c.         “Those who believe and come to him will be branded by him as though cattle; those who reject his mark will either flee into the mountains, or they will be seized and killed by well-contrived tortures.” (Lactantius, Div. Inst. 7.17.7, tr. McDonald, 518)

3.         Historical and Cultural Background

a.         It could refer to the branding of slaves and religious devotees or the tattooing of soldiers. Malina says it is a triangle (Delta), a pyramid as a symbol of Zeus (177-178).

b.         Coins with the emperor’s image.

c.         Deeds and citizenship papers stamped with the imperial seal.

d.         Tephillim:

1)         The Torah was to be written as a sign on their hands (Exod 13:9 עַל־יָדְךָ לְאוֹת  / σημεῖον ἐπὶ τῆς χειρός σου).

2)         It was also to be a reminder on their forehead (בֵּין עֵינֶיךָ וּלְזִכָּרוֹן / μνημόσυνον πρὸ ὀφθαλμῶν σου).

3)         See also Exod 13:16; Deut 6:8; 11:18.

4)         “The ‘forehead’ represents their ideological commitment and the ‘hand’ the practical outworking of that commitment.” (Beale and Carson, 1130)

e.         Can’t buy or sell without the mark of the beast (ἵνα of result).

1)         The Roman government did not impose economic sanctions, so most likely local. (Johnson, 532-533).

2)         Bauckham claims John is exaggerating the situation to emphasize the logical totalitarian result of the absolutizing of political power through religious means. (Bauckham, Theology, 38)

3)         Possibly refers to the trade guilds which required participation in the religious life of the community, including emperor worship.

4)         “Economic warfare by the state against the church.” (Beasley-Murray)

4.         Interpretive Options (see Appendix IV)

a.         Preterit

1)         Metaphorical: symbolizes allegiance to Rome.

2)         Tephillim, branding, coins, or seal of deeds with emperor’s name and year; possibly related to trade guilds.

b.         Idealist

1)         A sign of allegiance to Rome or any secular power.

2)         Symbolic of worshipping and identifying with the beast in thought (forehead) and action (right hand) throughout history.

c.         Futurist

1)         A metaphorical mark implying ownership and allegiance to the beast.

2)         A physical and visible branding, perhaps the beast’s emblem, name, or number.





IV.       Analysis of Revelation 13:11-18

G.        The Image of the Beast

            λέγων τοῖς κατοικοῦσιν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ποιῆσαι εἰκόνα τῷ θηρίῳ, ὃς ἔχει τὴν πληγὴν τῆς μαχαίρης καὶ ἔζησεν. Καὶ ἐδόθη αὐτῷ δοῦναι πνεῦμα τῇ εἰκόνι τοῦ θηρίου, ἵνα καὶ λαλήσῃ ἡ εἰκὼν τοῦ θηρίου καὶ ποιήσῃ [ἵνα] ὅσοι ἐὰν μὴ προσκυνήσωσιν τῇ εἰκόνι τοῦ θηρίου ἀποκτανθῶσιν. (13:14b-15)

1.         Textual and Exegetical Issues

a.         ποιήσῃ [ἵνα] ὅσοι {C}

            “The word ἵνα, which seems to be indispensable with ἀποκτανθῶσιν, stands after ποιήσῃ in A P 1006 2065 al, and before ἀποκτανθῶσιν in 051 1 1854 2073 and the Textus Receptus. The latter reading, which is supported by inferior external witnesses, is an obvious scribal amelioration of the difficulty occasioned by ἵνα … ἐάν followed by two verbs in the subjunctive. The omission of ἵνα in 046 1611 1859 al appears to be accidental, resulting in a shift of subject (“that even the image of the beast should speak; and he shall cause that as many as . . . should be killed” ASVmg). In view of the multiplicity of readings, no one of which clearly explains the origin of the others, a majority of the Committee thought it best to include ἵνα in the text, but to enclose the word within square brackets.” (Metzger, 675-676)

b.         The second beast commands that an image of the first beast be made.

1)         λέγων followed by an infinitive (“to make an image…”) is sufficiently ambiguous in Greek that it could be taken as “he ordered” (so NIV) or “he persuaded” (so REB).

2)         ποιέω is used 30 times in Rev; ποιέω is used 17 times in LXX of Gen. 1-2 for ברא or עשׂה. This seems to be a parody of God’s creating man after his own image:

εἰκόνα θεοῦ (Gen 1:27)       vs.           εἰκόνι τοῦ θηρίου (Rev 13:15)

εἰκόνα ἡμετέραν (Gen 1:26)   εἰκόνα αὐτοῦ (14:9, 11; 15:2; 16:2; 19:20; 20:4)

3)         εἰκὼν used 23 times in the NT, 10 times in Revelation, all for the image of the beast. Used in LXX of Gen. 1:26-27 of God making man in his own image (צלמ). It is also a blatant violation of the second commandment (Exod 20:4).

εἰκὼν: 1. an object shaped to resemble the form or appearance of someth., likeness, portrait. 2. that which has the same form as someth. else (not a crafted object as in 1 above), living image, fig. ext. of 1 εἰκὼν τοῦ θεοῦ. 3. that which represents someth. else in terms of basic form and features, form, appearance (BDAG).

צֶלֶם:     n.m. image (something cut out, cf. פֶּסֶל) — 1. images of tumours and mice (of gold); esp. of heathen gods; of painted pictures of men. 2. image, likeness, of resemblance, of God’s making man in his own image. 3. fig. = mere, empty, image, semblance, ’ בְּצas ( בessentiae) a (mere) semblance man walks about; צַלְמָם תִּבְזֶה thou wilt despise their semblance (BDB).

ὁμοίωσιν:        LXX translation of דְּמוּת.

דְּמוּת:    n.f. likeness, similitude (mostly late) —1. likeness, similitude, of external appearance (likeness, i.e. something that appeared like). 2. adverbially, in likeness of, like as (BDB).

c.         The second beast is allowed (ἐδόθη) to give breath (πνεῦμα) to the image so that it lives and speaks (gives oracles).

1)         Parody of God breathing into man (Gen 2:7).

            הָאָדָם לְנֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה וַיִּפַּח בְּאַפָּיו נִשְׁמַת חַיִּים וַיְהִי  /  ἐνεφύσησεν εἰς τὸ πρόσωπον αὐτοῦ πνοὴν ζωῆς, καὶ ἐγένετο ὁ ἄνθρωπος εἰς ψυχὴν ζῶσαν

2)         Also parodies God’s giving life (πνεῦμα ζωῆς ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ) back to the two witnesses (Rev 11:11).

3)         God is still in control since he is the one who allows (ἐδόθη) it.

d.         Two words were used of statues: ἄγαλμα and εἰκών. While their meanings overlap, the former usually refers to statues placed in public settings while the latter referred to images honored in the imperial cult. (Aune, 761)

e.         The second beast makes those who dwell on earth worship the image of the beast.

1)         Earth-dwellers (κατοικοῦντας ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς) is a technical term in Revelation for those who do not worship God (3:10; 6:10; 8:13; 11:10; 13:8, 12, 14; 17:2, 8).

2)         This phrase (ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς) is used 19 times in Revelation (3:10; 5:3, 10, 13; 6:10; 7:1; 8:13; 10:2, 5, 8; 11:10; 13:8, 14; 14:6; 16:18; 17:8; 18:24), 38 times in the rest of the NT, 263 times in the LXX, 56 times in PSEUD.

3)         προσκυνέω is used 24 times, indicating that worship is a major theme in Revelation (Rev 3:9; 4:10; 5:14; 7:11; 9:20; 11:1, 16; 13:4, 8, 12, 15; 14:7, 9, 11; 15:4; 16:2; 19:4, 10, 20; 20:4; 22:8–9).

           “The Apocalypse divides mankind into the worshippers of the dragon and the beast (13:4, 8, 12, 15; 15:9, 11; 16:2; 19:20; 20:4; cf. the emphasis on idolatry in 2:14, 20; 9:20) and those who will worship God in the heavenly Jerusalem (7:15; 14:3; 15:3-4; 22:3; cf. 11:1).” (Bauckham, Climax, 135)

           “In a sense the theme of his whole prophecy is the distinction between true worship and idolatry, a distinction for which Christians in the contemporary situation needed prophetic discernment.” (Bauckham, Climax, 135)

4)         Those who do not worship the image of the beast are put to death

           Passive: the image does not kill them but has someone else kill them.

           Antipas had already been put to death in Pergamum (Rev 2:13).

           The martyrs under the altar most likely others who had been put to death by Nero (Rev 6:9-11; 16:6; 17:6; 20:4).

           Tradition teaches that Peter and Paul were martyred by Nero.

           John the Baptist, Stephen, and James had been martyred earlier.

           Tradition relates the martyrdom of the rest of the apostles, and the Early Church Fathers records the martyrdoms of Polycarp and Justin Martyr.

           The saints gain victory over the beast “by blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, for they loved not their lives even unto death.” (12:11)

           They are rewarded and get to stand before God’s throne: “those who had conquered the beast and its image and the number of its name, standing beside the sea of glass with harps of God in their hands.” (15:2)

           God is judging Rome for the slaughter of all of her innocent victims (18:24).

           The emphasis is not that Rome persecutes Christians but that because Rome has absolutized its power those who oppose this idolatry by worshipping God through Christ, the only true absolute power, will be persecuted. (Bauckham, Theology, 39)

           Those who do not receive the mark of the beast will be resurrected and reign with Christ for a thousand years (20:4).

5)         Those who worship the image will be judged by God (14:9-11; 16:2; 19:20).

2.         Literary Background

a.         This scene seems to be built on Daniel 3.

1)         An image is built.

2)         Worship is demanded of all peoples, nations, and languages (Nebuchadnezzar (Dan 3:1-6) “commanded” (LXX: παραγγέλλεται; THEOD: λέγεται) the nations to worship it.

3)         Death is decreed for all who don’t worship the image.

4)         The king’s advisors are the ones who originate the idea.

5)         While there is no indication in Daniel that Nebuchadnezzar expected to be worshipped as a god, Hippolytus suggested that this is the reason the statue was made. (Comm. on Dan. 3.4)

b.         Ascension of Isaiah: “And he will set up his image before him in every city.” (4:11)

1)         However, here the beast sets up the image and works miracles himself, while in Revelation it is the second beast who does this on behalf of the first beast.

2)         Revelation separates these two aspects of the end time figure while Ascension of Isaiah combines them into one individual. (Bauckham, Climax, 434)

3.         Historical and Cultural Background

a.         Several tyrants attempted to set up images of themselves in the Jerusalem temple.

1)         Manasseh set up a carved image, a molten statue (τὸ γλυπτὸν καὶ τὸ χωνευτόν, εἰκόνα ἣν ἐποίησεν / עָשָׂהאֲשֶׁר הַסֶּמֶל אֶת־פֶּסֶל וַיָּשֶׂם) in the temple (2 Chr 33:7).

2)         Antiochus IV Epiphanes set up a statue of himself as Zeus in temples, even the Jerusalem temple (Joseph. Ant. 14:153; 18:79, 257–302; 19:8–9; Dan 11:30-39; cf. 1 Macc 1:10-15, 20-61; 2 Macc 6:1-11).

3)         Caligula tried to set up a statue of himself in the Jerusalem Temple (Joseph., War 2:184–203; Antiq 18:261–309; Philo Leg 188, 346).

4)         Jesus warned of the “Abomination that causes Desolation” standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15; Mark 13:44).

b.         This statue probably represents the Imperial Cult in Asia Minor.

1)         Domitian granted Ephesus guardianship of his temple with its colossal statue, so everyone in the province worshiped Domitian on the emperor’s birthday. (Keener, in loc.)

2)         There were numerous statues of the emperors in the imperial cult. Ephesus had temples to Julius Caesar, Augustus, Domitian, Hadrian. Imperial statues were venerated everywhere in the cities, in buildings, porticoes, fountains, gates, streets, with incense, wine, and bulls offered to them. (Thompson, 162-163)

3)         A sacred precinct was set apart for the worship of Caligula at Miletus in the province of Asia and two temples were erected for worship of him in Rome.  The Temple of Castor and Pollux on the Forum was linked directly to the Imperial residence on the Palatine and dedicated to Caligula (Dio Cassius, Roman History, 59.28).

4)         Living emperors could be worshipped as divine in the east while only dead Emperors deified by the Senate could be worshipped as divine in Rome. (Cassius Dio, Roman History, 51.20)

           Caligula claimed divinity (Philo, Leg 353), and took the title optimus maximus Caesar, “Caesar best and greatest” and was greeted as Jupiter. (Suet., Life of Caligula, 22.1-2)

           Domitian claimed deity (Pliny, Pan, 33.4) and sent letters signed “our Lord
and God” and demanded to be addressed as “Lord and God” (Suet., Life of Domitian, 13.2) or as “master and god” (Dio Cassius, Roman History, 67.5.7).

           “The imperial cult mediated the presence of an absent emperor.” (Aune, 778)

           After declaring the freedom of Greece, Nero was hailed by the priest of the imperial cult “the mightiest emperor, philhellene, Nero Zeus god of freedom.” (Bauckham, Climax, 409)

5)         Elaborate machines and pipes were used to make statues move and talk in the ancient world, and theurgists would put magical materials into the statue, making it able to give divine oracles (Osborne, 516), a process called τελεστική or ἡ θεουργικὴ τέχνη that created a connection between the statue and the god it represented (Aune, 763). While the educated elite did not think that the statues were objects to be worshipped, the masses believed that the gods lived in the statues. (Aune, 762)

6)         While there is no evidence for an imperial decree to persecute Christians, Pliny wrote to Trajan that he had executed some Christians for not offering wine and incense to the statue of the emperor (Pliny, Epistle, 96).

4.         Interpretive Options (see Appendix IV)

a.         Preterit

1)         Image of the emperor on coins.

2)         Statues made to appear alive and give oracles through ventriloquism and pulleys.

3)         The Jewish Synagogue displayed in the Jew’s rejection of Christ and the Synagogues forcing Jews to worship the emperor and persecuting Christians.

b.         Idealist

1)         Symbolic of false teachers leading people into worshipping the state.

2)         Men throughout history who have raise statues to themselves for people to revere.

c.         Futurist

1)         A literal statue that comes to life either through demonic animation or trickery. Osborne says the statue of the beast will actually speak without pulleys and ventriloquism. (Osborne, 515)

2)         A statue of the first Beast set up in the final rebuilt temple in Jerusalem.





IV.       Analysis of Revelation 13:11-18

F.         Heals the Beast’s Fatal Wound

            οὗ ἐθεραπεύθη ἡ πληγὴ τοῦ θανάτου αὐτοῦ (13:12b)

1.         Textual and Exegetical Issues

a.         The first beast has a wound (πληγὴ).

1)         πληγὴ is used 16 times in Revelation, 13 for the plagues that God sends on the earth, 3 for the first beast’s wound (13:3, 12, 14).

2)         It can also mean a sudden hard stroke or blow with an instrument; a wound or bruise caused by a blow; a sudden calamity that causes severe distress, blow in the sense ‘a blow of fate’ (BDAG).

3)         It is called a “mortal” wound in 13:3 (ἡ πληγὴ τοῦ θανάτου αὐτοῦ “his plague of death” objective genitive: blow causing death).

4)         Here it is a “sword” wound (τὴν πληγὴν τῆς μαχαίρης). Bauckham (Climax, 433) thinks it could refer to Christ’s sword from his mouth that carries out God’s judgment (1:16; 2:12, 16; 19:15, 21). However, Christ has a ῥομφαία not a μάχαιρα.

5)         ἡ πληγὴ may have been used because of its reference to the plagues that bring judgment on the beast (9:18-19; 11:6; 15:1-2; 16:9, 21; 18:4, 8; 21:9; 22:18).

6)         In 13:3 it is one of the heads that is wounded while in 13:14 it is the beast itself that is wounded.

b.         It is not clear who heals (ἐθεραπεύθη) the sea beast’s wound.

1)         This is a relative clause used analeptically to give additional information about the first beast’s wound (Rev 13:3, 12).

2)         θεραπεύω means to render service or homage; to heal, restore (BDAG).

3)         It is used only twice in Rev (13:3, 12), both for the healing of the first beast’s wound; it is used 40 other times in the NT, all for healing except once, in Acts 17:25 for rendering service to the gods.

4)         Coming back to life is a parody of Christ’s resurrection; ἔζησεν is used of Christ coming back to life in Rev 2:8; 20:4, 5. (Osborne, 515). 

2.         Literary Background

a.         Just as the Lamb was slain (σφάζω 5:5, 6, 12), one of the heads of the first beast was slain unto death (μίαν ἐκ τῶν κεφαλῶν αὐτοῦ ὡς ἐσφαγμένην εἰς θάνατον 13:3).

b.         Just as Jesus rose again, so too the first beast rises from the dead.

3.         Historical and Cultural Background

a.         Nero Redivivus (see Appendix III)

1)         Nero was depicted as the end time tyrant (Sibylline Oracles 5.361–376, 8.68–72, 8.531–157).

2)         Nero committed suicide by thrusting a dagger into his neck

3)         Lactantius wrote that Nero, “suddenly disappeared, and even the burial-place of that noxious wild beast was nowhere to be seen. This has led some persons of extravagant imagination to suppose that, having been conveyed to a distant region, he is still reserved alive; and to him they apply the Sibylline verses.” (Lactantius, Of the Manner in Which the Persecutors Died, II)

4)         Tacitus describes Nero extensively torturing and executing Christians after the fire of 64. (Tacitus, Annals, XV.44)

5)         Suetonius (Life of Nero, 16) says Nero punishing Christians because they were “given to a new and mischievous superstition” but he does not connect this persecution with the fire.

6)         The eighth king of 17:11, the Antichrist, receives this wound. (Osborne, 513) In some reckonings, Nero was the eighth emperor, who would return.

           Nero Claudius Caesar was born on December 15, 37 AD, was emperor of Rome 54-68 AD, deposed by the Senate on June 8, 68 AD, and committed suicide the next day.

           There were few witnesses who saw his corpse and his burial, causing rumors to spread that he was still alive.

           Many believed he had fled to Parthia and would return as the leader of the dreaded Parthian army, numbering in the myriads (Suetonius, Life of Nero, 57; DioChrys, Orat., 21.10). The Sibylline Oracles and the Ascension of Isaiah have several different accounts of a Nero Redivivus (SibOr 3.63-74; 4.119-122, 137-139; 5.28-34, 93-110, 137-154, 214-227, 361-380; 8.68-72; 12.78-94; AscIsa4.2-14). Bauckham claims John is using two of these different accounts. (Bauckham, Climax, 423)

           The Parthians defeated Rome in 55 BC and A.D. 62 and made several incursions into Roman territory in the 60s and 70s. (Osborne, 277)

           After Nero’ death, edicts were issued in his name threatening his enemies, and three imposters posed as the returned emperor. (Aune, 739; Bauckham, Climax, 413-414)

           Nero was loathed in Rome but loved in the provinces. (Aune, 780)

           The Parthians worshipped Nero as the god Mithras because he brokered a peace with Armenia and crowned prince Tiridates king of Armenia. (Bauckham, Climax, 409)

           Because of his brutality, some Romans called him a beast. (Bauckham, Climax, 409)

           Nero was the emperor who sent Vespatian to attack Jerusalem, so Jews often hold him responsible for its destruction. (Bauckham, Climax, 410)

7)         However, in the Nero Redivivus legend, Nero only disappears while in Revelation he dies and comes back to life.

8)         The return of Nero is a parody of the Parousia of Christ, and who was and is and is to come (17:8, cf. 11) is a parody of God in the Parousia of Christ (4:8; cf. 11:17; 16:5). (Bauckham, Climax, 396)

9)         Noah was the 8th saved (2 Enoch 33:1-2; Barn 15:9) and Sunday is the 8th day = new creation. It is not certain whether John is using this parallel. (Bauckham, Climax, 396)

b.         Domitian

1)         Many deny that there was any persecution of Christians during Domitian’s reign. Since the Roman historians were anti-Flavian, they made up the stories to discredit him (Collins, A.Y., Crisis and Catharsis; Fiorenza, Revelation and Judgment).

2)         Even if there was little official persecution, the emperor would still have been seen as responsible for any local persecution that arose from Christians’ refusing to worship the emperor cult (see below).

4.         Interpretive Options (see Appendix IV)

a.         Preterit

1)         Nero Redivivus.

2)         The period of chaos in AD 69 during the “Year of the Four Emperors.”

3)         Rome stopped persecuting Christians when Nero committed suicide but started persecuting them again under Domitian.

b.         Idealist

1)         A false resurrection of Rome leads to the worship of Rome, symbolizing the rise and fall of human empires throughout history and man’s worship of them.

2)         Satan was wounded by Christ’s death.

c.         Futurist

1)         Antichrist actually dies, descends to the abyss, and returns to life through the power of Satan.

2)         The fallen Roman Empire will be revived at the end of time.