Book 6 of Josephus’s Wars of the Jews follows the last summer of Jerusalem in 70 CE, from the Roman assault on the Antonia Fortress in the month Panemus to the burning of the Upper City in Gorpieus. Vespasian has left for Rome to secure the throne after the Year of the Four Emperors, and his son Titus commands four legions, the Fifth Macedonica, the Tenth Fretensis, the Fifteenth Apollinaris, and the Twelfth Fulminata, with auxiliaries from King Agrippa II and Sohaemus. Inside the walls John of Gischala holds the Temple precincts and the Antonia, Simon bar Giora holds the Upper City and part of the Lower City, and the Zealots under Eleazar ben Simon, who once held the Inner Court, have bent to John’s violence. Civilians sit between Roman ballistae, catapults, and battering rams on one side and factional terror on the other. Josephus records all of it as a man who stood before the walls and pleaded for surrender.
Christians have a stake in this book because Jesus spoke of these events before they happened. The daily sacrifice stops, famine consumes the city, a mother devours her child, and fire takes the Sanctuary, and each scene fills in with historical detail what Moses, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel warned and what the Lord Jesus foretold on the Mount of Olives. Josephus reads the catastrophe through a Second Temple Jewish model of providence shaped by Roman patronage, and Scripture supplies the measure for what he gets right and what he gets wrong. This post reads him with the Bible open beside him.
Literary Backgrounds: Greek and Ancient Near Eastern Connections
Josephus writes Hellenistic historiography on the model of Thucydides and Polybius, and he shades it with the conventions of tragedy (τραγῳδία) to draw pity (ἔλεος) and fear (φόβος) from his readers. The book moves in five stages. The Antonia assault and the famine open it, the end of the daily sacrifice and Josephus’s speech to John follow, the cannibalism of Mary of Bethezuba forms the tragic climax, the burning of the Temple on the tenth of Lous comes next, and the prodigies, the fall of Zion, the casualty figures, and Josephus’s closing assessment fill the last movement. He casts Titus as a noble and restrained minister of vengeance who wants to preserve the Temple’s architecture, and he casts John and Simon as τύραννοι, impious men blinded by ὕβρις. That pattern of arrogance drawing down divine judgment owes much to Herodotus, and Josephus frames the fall of Jerusalem as a tragedy that surpasses the fall of Troy that Homer and the playwrights made famous.
Josephus also steers the reader’s attention with great care. His gaze moves from the outer walls to the Antonia, then into the Temple courts, through the Holy Place, and finally to the Inner Sanctuary, and that tightening of space mirrors the Roman ring closing on the population. He slows narrative time to a crawl while Mary prepares her meal and speeds it up through the chaos of fire, so the reader feels the end coming. He interrupts his own history to address his audience and insists that he writes under the weight of tragic truth, with no wish to flatter Rome or to hate his people. Thucydides described the lawlessness (ἀνομία) and the broken family bonds of the Athenian plague, and Euripides staged mothers who harm their children in Medea and The Trojan Women, so Josephus’s readers already knew the shape of the horror. The Mesopotamian Lamentation over the Destruction of Ur and the Roman practice of evocatio, which called an enemy’s gods out of a besieged city, supply the model for his picture of God leaving the Second Temple, announced by mysterious voices in the night. Tacitus, Suetonius, Dio Cassius, and the rabbinic account of Yochanan ben Zakkai’s escape from Jerusalem in a coffin confirm the siege from other angles.
Theological and Ethical Analysis
Josephus makes one theological claim central to the whole book: God drives the Roman advance. He presents God as the active initiator, the Romans as instruments of judgment, and the Sanctuary as abandoned by its owner because the tyrants defiled it. The irony cuts deep, since the Zealots turn the place of divine protection into a fortress and a slaughterhouse and so guarantee its desertion. The daily sacrifice (תָּמִיד) ends on the seventeenth of Panemus when priests and animals run out, Titus challenges John to fight in open battle rather than defile the Temple, and John refuses. Famine (λιμός) tightens the squeeze after rival factions burn the city’s granaries. Food becomes the ultimate commodity, prices climb out of reach, honor and shame turn upside down, and factional guards search private homes for hidden bread.
Mary of Bethezuba, a wealthy woman from Perea, kills her infant son, cooks him, eats half, and reserves the rest for the plunderers who come looking for food (Wars 6.201–213). Josephus places her at the moral center of the book because her act shows the total inversion of nature, covenant, and humanity. Thucydides recorded that plague loosened the bonds of family, and Josephus records a mother who consumes her own child, yet neither historian offers a remedy for the sin underneath. Josephus sorts the actors into irredeemable tyrants and helpless victims, and Scripture corrects that sorting. The whole nation stood under the covenant sanctions, and God judged a people who had broken His covenant. God also uses pagan instruments without endorsing them. Isaiah 10:5–15 shows the rod of His anger judged in its turn, and Rome’s discipline gives Titus no righteousness of his own.
Old Testament Analysis and Critique
Deuteronomy 28:53–57 sits in Moses’ second address on the plains of Moab, where the covenant sanctions climb from blessing to curse. A nation from afar besieges Israel’s cities, natural affection dies, and the most tender and delicate woman eats her children secretly in the siege. Leviticus 26:29 gives the same warning. Josephus records Mary’s act as the fulfillment of that written word, and he uses it to show that the fall of Jerusalem displays the exact execution of God’s covenant justice and leaves no room for the idea that Israel’s God lost His power. Jeremiah 19:8–9 adds the sign-act in the Valley of Ben-Hinnom, where the prophet smashes a potter’s flask and announces that the besieged will eat the flesh of their sons and daughters. Lamentations records what the eyewitnesses saw in 586 BCE, with children fainting for hunger on every street corner and compassionate women boiling their own children (Lamentations 2; 4:9–10). The first Temple fell for idolatry, along with bloodshed and social oppression, and that fall set a canonical pattern in which judgment strikes first at the house of God when it turns corrupt.
Josephus borrows the prophetic voices and bends them. He models his speech before the walls on Jeremiah’s Temple Sermon in Jeremiah 7 and on Jeremiah’s call to submit to Nebuchadnezzar in Jeremiah 27–29, and the Zealots repeat the error of those who chanted “the temple of the LORD” while they oppressed the vulnerable. The movement of God out of the Sanctuary echoes Ezekiel 10–11, where the glory rises from the Temple before the Babylonians burn it. Daniel 9:26–27, 11:31, and 12:11 foretell the end of the daily sacrifice and an abomination in the sanctuary, and Josephus reports Roman standards (signa) set up in the Temple court, where soldiers sacrifice to them (Wars 6.316). Jeremiah looked past the ruins to a new covenant in Jeremiah 31, and Josephus looks past them to Rome. He applies Judean prophecy to Vespasian as the promised ruler of the world and validates the Flavian house, where the prophets point to the Messiah and to redemption.
No comments:
Post a Comment